Dynamic topic adaptation for smt using distributional profiles

11Citations
Citations of this article
90Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Despite its potential to improve lexical selection, most state-of-The-Art machine translation systems take only minimal contextual information into account. We capture context with a topic model over distributional profiles built from the context words of each translation unit. Topic distributions are inferred for each translation unit and used to adapt the translation model dynamically to a given test context by measuring their similarity. We show that combining information from both local and global test contexts helps to improve lexical selection and outperforms a baseline system by up to 1.15 BLEU. We test our topic-Adapted model on a diverse data set containing documents from three different domains and achieve competitive performance in comparison with two supervised domain-Adapted systems.

References Powered by Scopus

One translation per discourse

52Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Bilingual LSA-based adaptation for statistical machine translation

32Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Dynamic topic adaptation for phrase-based MT

27Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Personalized machine translation: Preserving original author traits

75Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

What's in a domain? Analyzing genre and topic differences in statistical machine translation

23Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A context-Aware topic model for statistical machine translation

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hasler, E., Haddow, B., & Koehn, P. (2014). Dynamic topic adaptation for smt using distributional profiles. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 445–456). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/w14-3358

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 33

69%

Researcher 7

15%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 41

77%

Linguistics 7

13%

Social Sciences 3

6%

Engineering 2

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free