Pharyngeal electrical stimulation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a pilot study

7Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) suffer from dysphagia that increases the risk for aspiration, pneumonia and weight loss. Pharyngeal electrical stimulation (PES) is a therapeutic technique that applies electric stimuli to the patient’s pharynx in order to improve swallowing based on the principle of cortical plasticity and reorganization. Previous studies have demonstrated positive effects in patients with various neurological diseases. Objective: This study was initiated to investigate the effect of PES on swallowing function in patients with ALS. Methods: In all, 20 ALS patients with severe dysphagia [characterized by a Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS) of at least 4 in thin liquid] were randomized to receive either PES for 10 min at 3 consecutive days in addition to Standard Logopaedic Therapy (SLT) or SLT alone. Swallowing function was evaluated by Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) at five timepoints: at baseline, 1 day, 4 days, 3 weeks and 3 months after treatment. Primary endpoint was the severity of penetrations or aspirations as classified by PAS. Secondary endpoints were adverse events, dysphagia-related quality of life, Swallowing Quality of Life (SWAL-QOL), Dysphagia Severity Rating Scale (DSRS), residues, leaking, ALS Functional Rating Scale Revised (ALSFRS-R), and the performance in Clinical Evaluation of Swallowing (CES). The trial is registered under the name of ‘Pharyngeal Electrical Stimulation in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis’ with ClinialTrials.gov, number NCT03481348 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03481348). Results: Both groups combined showed a significant improvement (p = 0.003) of median Total-PAS from 3.6 [interquartile range (IQR) = 2.9–5.0] at baseline to 2.3 (IQR = 1.8–4.0) 1 day after treatment. During subsequent study visits, PAS increased again but remained below baseline. PES and control group did not differ significantly 1 day after intervention (p = 0.32). Similar effects were found in the majority of secondary endpoints. Interpretation: The findings suggest that PES may not provide an additional positive effect on swallowing function in ALS. SLT seems to yield at least short-term positive effects on swallowing function and swallowing-specific life quality in ALS. Registration: ClinialTrials.gov: NCT03481348

References Powered by Scopus

El Escorial revisited: Revised criteria for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

4676Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The ALSFRS-R: A revised ALS functional rating scale that incorporates assessments of respiratory function

2700Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A penetration-aspiration scale

2082Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Safety and performance of oropharyngeal muscle strength training in the treatment of post-stroke dysphagia during oral feeding: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Oropharyngeal Dysphagia as the Main Expression of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Current State and Future Directions of Swallowing Care in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Herrmann, C., Schradt, F., Lindner-Pfleghar, B., Schuster, J., Ludolph, A. C., & Dorst, J. (2022). Pharyngeal electrical stimulation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a pilot study. Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders, 15. https://doi.org/10.1177/17562864211068394

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

46%

Researcher 3

23%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

15%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 10

63%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

19%

Neuroscience 2

13%

Psychology 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free