Exploration of fatigue and modal analysis on mono leaf suspension made by natural composite materials

5Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Leaf Spring architecture is a major achievement in the design and production of the product in commercial vehicles. The most common designs with a multiplicity of leaves are leaf springs which display hysteresis when loaded and unloaded. The approaches often used to evaluate spring strength are time intensive and expensive, such as resilience tests on the field and rough tests. In the early stage of the design cycle, however, simulated ways to measure strength and rigidity offer useful knowledge and save time and cost. They are versatile for the assessment of various design options and for the early shift in design. In this work, mono leaf spring suspension was analyzed on the fatigue and modal with different composite made by E-Glass and natural fibers and the results are compared with the base materials steel (65Si7). The 3D modelling was carried out and analyzed with ANSYS on both a steel and a composites blade spring.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Comparative analysis of static and vibration characteristics of glass fiber reinforced epoxy mono composite leaf spring and conventional steel leaf spring

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Fabrication, Design Optimization and stress analysis of mono leaf spring using MMC

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Finite element analysis of composite leaf spring for TATA-ACE

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Venkatesh, A. P., Padmanabhan, S., Allen Rufus, C., Mohammed Lukmaan, H., & Abdul Rahman, A. R. (2021). Exploration of fatigue and modal analysis on mono leaf suspension made by natural composite materials. In Materials Today: Proceedings (Vol. 47, pp. 4262–4267). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.568

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

50%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

33%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 4

80%

Materials Science 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0