Does the source matter? How referral channels and personal communication tools affect consumers' referral propensity

1Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Many companies are using social sharing buttons to make it easier for consumers to refer a website or app to other potential consumers. Although these buttons are ubiquitous online, it remains unclear whether consumer referral propensity (i.e. the likelihood of consumers referring other consumers) varies across the channels through which consumers arrive at the website. In particular, we test whether referral propensity is higher for consumers themselves acquired through social referrals and compare them with consumers accessing the website through other commonly used channels, such as search engines and online advertisements. In addition, we examine whether the communication tool (i.e. social networking websites or instant messaging clients) through which the referral is transmitted affects consumers' referral decisions. Our results indicate that consumers acquired through social referrals are more likely to make a referral and that the communication tools do not differ in their influence on consumers' referral propensity.

References Powered by Scopus

Get full text
8431Citations
1374Readers

Your institution provides access to this article.

This article is free to access.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Digitization for fun or reward? A study of acceptance of wearable devices for personal healthcare

12Citations
71Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Köster, A., Matt, C., & Hess, T. (2017). Does the source matter? How referral channels and personal communication tools affect consumers’ referral propensity. In Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Vol. 2017-January, pp. 3915–3924). IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2017.473

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘21‘2302468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

43%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

29%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

14%

Researcher 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 4

57%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

14%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

14%

Arts and Humanities 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0