Chatbots and service failure: When does it lead to customer aggression

70Citations
Citations of this article
238Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Artificial intelligence technology is changing the way services are delivered and introducing opportunities for new sources of service failure. The purpose of this paper is to examine how customers might respond (emotion- or problem-focused coping) to service failure of a chatbot when there is an option to interact with a human employee. Using data from 145 participants, we found that in a chatbot service failure context, telling a customer late in the service interaction that a human employee is available to help leads customers to engage in emotion-focused coping, resulting in customer aggression. The positive relationship between late disclosure and emotion-focused coping occurs with those who perceive low customer participation whereby they do not believe they are overly involved in co-producing and co-delivering the service. This research demonstrates how chatbot service failure in a service encounter can produce different effects on customers’ intention to engage in aggression.

References Powered by Scopus

PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet

15178Citations
17884Readers
9706Citations
8898Readers
Get full text
8114Citations
5050Readers
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Get full text
Get full text

Chatbots’ effectiveness in service recovery

44Citations
287Readers

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Huang, Y. S. (Sandy), & Dootson, P. (2022). Chatbots and service failure: When does it lead to customer aggression. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103044

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 46

57%

Lecturer / Post doc 18

23%

Researcher 10

13%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 51

69%

Social Sciences 9

12%

Computer Science 7

9%

Engineering 7

9%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free