A Survey of MWE Identification Experiments: The Devil is in the Details

2Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Multiword expression (MWE) identification has been the focus of numerous research papers, especially in the context of the DiMSUM and PARSEME Shared Tasks (STs). This survey analyses 40 MWE identification papers with experiments on data from these STs. We look at corpus selection, pre- and post-processing, MWE encoding, evaluation metrics, statistical significance, and error analyses. We find that these aspects are usually considered minor and/or omitted in the literature. However, they may considerably impact the results and the conclusions drawn from them. Therefore, we advocate for more systematic descriptions of experimental conditions to reduce the risk of misleading conclusions drawn from poorly designed experimental setup.

References Powered by Scopus

The hitchhiker's guide to testing statistical significance in natural language processing

319Citations
374Readers
177Citations
179Readers

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ramisch, C., Walsh, A., Blanchard, T., & Taslimipoor, S. (2023). A Survey of MWE Identification Experiments: The Devil is in the Details. In 19th Workshop on Multiword Expressions, MWE 2023 - Proceedings (pp. 106–120). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.mwe-1.15

Readers over time

‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

60%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

40%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 6

75%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

13%

Neuroscience 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0