Field dependence/independence and learning condition: an exploratory study of style vs ability.

10Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Recent reviews have concluded that field-independent individuals typically show learning equal or superior to that of field-dependent individuals. However, many studies supporting these conclusions have not capitalized fully on the stylistic strengths of field-dependent learners. Among 35 field-independent and 42 field-dependent undergraduates, when grade-point average was controlled, no significant differences were found in scores on an examination following an audiotaped lecture. However, field-dependent learners significantly outperformed their field-independent peers on follow-up quizzes when material was presented interactively, using examples that required social sensitivity for full appreciation. These results are discussed as supporting the importance of further study of the stylistic aspects of field dependence/independence and the narrowness of conceptualizations of individual differences when teaching.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The relationship between some psychological factors and their effect on the performance of grid questions and word association tests

66Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Field dependence as a factor in second language communicative production

45Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The cognitive style of nursing students: Educational implications for teaching and learning

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rollock, D. (1992). Field dependence/independence and learning condition: an exploratory study of style vs ability. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 74(3 Pt 1), 807–818. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1992.74.3.807

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 1

50%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

50%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Mathematics 1

33%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

33%

Psychology 1

33%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free