Dose-finding studies in drug development for rare genetic diseases

7Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The small patient populations inherent to rare genetic diseases present many challenges to the traditional drug development paradigm. One major challenge is generating sufficient data in early phase studies to inform dose selection for later phase studies and dose optimization for clinical use of the drug. However, optimizing the benefit-risk profile of drugs through appropriate dose selection during drug development is critical for all drugs, including those being developed to treat rare diseases. Recognizing the challenges of conducting dose finding studies in rare disease populations and the importance of dose selection and optimization for successful drug development, we assessed the dose-finding studies and analyses conducted for drugs recently approved for rare genetic diseases. Results: Of the 40 marketing applications for new molecular entity (NME) drugs and biologics approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for rare genetic diseases from 2015 to 2020, 21 (53%) of the development programs conducted at least one dedicated dose-finding study. In addition, the majority of drug development programs conducted clinical studies in healthy subjects and included population pharmacokinetic and exposure–response analyses; some programs also conducted clinical studies in patient populations other than the disease for which the drug was initially approved. The majority of primary endpoints utilized in dedicated dose-finding studies were biomarkers, and the primary endpoint of the safety and efficacy study matched the primary endpoint used in the dose finding study in 9 of 13 (69%) drug development programs where primary study endpoints were assessed. Conclusions: Our study showed that NME drug development programs for rare genetic diseases utilize multiple data sources for dosing information, including studies in healthy subjects, population pharmacokinetic analyses, and exposure–response analyses. In addition, our results indicate that biomarkers play a key role in dose-finding studies for rare genetic disease drug development programs. Our findings highlight the need to develop study designs and methods to allow adequate dose-finding efforts within rare disease drug development programs that help overcome the challenges presented by low patient prevalence and other factors. Furthermore, the frequent reliance on biomarkers as endpoints for dose-finding studies underscores the importance of biomarker development in rare diseases.

References Powered by Scopus

Scientific and regulatory reasons for delay and denial of FDA approval of initial applications for new drugs, 2000-2012

189Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling in drug research and development

169Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Model-Informed Drug Development: Current US Regulatory Practice and Future Considerations

165Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Quantitative Systems Pharmacology for Rare Disease Drug Development

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Getting the Dose Right in Drug Development for Rare Diseases: Barriers and Enablers

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Dose Determinations at Drug Approval Reviews: FDA-Approved Drugs in Past 5 Years

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, L., Wang, J., Feng, J., Doi, M., Pepe, S., Pacanowski, M., & Schuck, R. N. (2022). Dose-finding studies in drug development for rare genetic diseases. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-022-02298-6

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

50%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

50%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

33%

Mathematics 1

33%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 1

33%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free