SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process

1.7kCitations
Citations of this article
806Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Since the publication of Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE 1.0) guidelines in 2008, the science of the field has advanced considerably. In this manuscript, we describe the development of SQUIRE 2.0 and its key components. We undertook the revision between 2012 and 2015 using (1) semistructured interviews and focus groups to evaluate SQUIRE 1.0 plus feedback from an international steering group, (2) two face-to-face consensus meetings to develop interim drafts and (3) pilot testing with authors and a public comment period. SQUIRE 2.0 emphasises the reporting of three key components of systematic efforts to improve the quality, value and safety of healthcare: the use of formal and informal theory in planning, implementing and evaluating improvement work; the context in which the work is done and the study of the intervention(s). SQUIRE 2.0 is intended for reporting the range of methods used to improve healthcare, recognising that they can be complex and multidimensional. It provides common ground to share these discoveries in the scholarly literature (http://www.squire-statement.org).

References Powered by Scopus

Better reporting of interventions: Template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide

6318Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The next GME accreditation system - Rationale and benefits

1203Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quality and safety education for nurses

875Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Social prescribing: Less rhetoric and more reality. A systematic review of the evidence

489Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Explanation and elaboration of the SQUIRE (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence) Guidelines, V.2.0: Examples of SQUIRE elements in the healthcare improvement literature

235Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Reporting scoping reviews—PRISMA ScR extension

228Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ogrinc, G., Davies, L., Goodman, D., Batalden, P., Davidoff, F., & Stevens, D. (2016). SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. BMJ Quality and Safety, 25(12), 986–992. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004411

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24055110165220

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 259

56%

Researcher 113

25%

Professor / Associate Prof. 63

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 25

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 292

68%

Nursing and Health Professions 89

21%

Psychology 28

6%

Social Sciences 23

5%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 3
References: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0