Systematic review of antibiograms: A national laboratory system approach for improving antimicrobial susceptibility testing practices in Michigan

17Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives. Public health surveillance is often dependent on sentinel testing performed in clinical microbiology laboratories, and recognition of emerging/ unusual antimicrobial resistance is especially challenging. We obtained cumulative antibiograms from hospitals to determine whether clinical laboratories recognized unusual resistance or reported antimicrobials inappropriate for various bacterial species, as measured before and after public health laboratory (PHL) educational and technical-support interventions. Methods. We compared cumulative antibiogram data from 81 clinical laboratories servicing 86 hospitals in Michigan from 2000 through 2005 with a standardized checklist derived from Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) documents. We considered the reporting of unlikely percent-susceptible results and/or inappropriate antimicrobials serious errors, and we calculated error rates for each data year. We used CLSI-recommendation compliance as a measure to determine whether laboratories were implementing changes. Results. Ninety-five of 239 (28%) cumulative antibiograms examined had one or more serious errors. The annual number of cumulative antibiograms with serious errors did not change radically (range: 10-13); however, when expressed as a percentage of cumulative antibiograms received, the occurrence of these errors declined from 59% in 2000 to 19% in 2005. The reporting of misleading or dangerous antimicrobial-organism combinations occurred less frequently than the reporting of unlikely percent-susceptible results. Compliance with new CLSI recommendations did not improve significantly. Conclusions. AST is complex and nuanced. PHL programs can provide resources, guidance, and technical support to help clinical microbiologists differentiate questionable AST results from true emerging antimicrobial resistance. ©2010 Association of Schools of Public Health.

References Powered by Scopus

Analysis and presentation of cumulative antibiograms: A new consensus guideline from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute

196Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Nationwide antibiogram analysis using NCCLS M39-A guidelines

54Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Are laboratory-based antibiograms reliable to guide the selection of empirical antimicrobial treatment in patients with hospital-acquired infections?

22Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Antimicrobial stewardship: How the microbiology laboratory can right the ship

153Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Current challenges and advancements towards discovery and resistance of antibiotics

50Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Challenges in preparation of cumulative antibiogram reports for community hospitals

40Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Boehme, M. S., Somsel, P. A., & Downes, F. P. (2010). Systematic review of antibiograms: A national laboratory system approach for improving antimicrobial susceptibility testing practices in Michigan. Public Health Reports. Association of Schools of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1177/00333549101250s208

Readers over time

‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 18

55%

Researcher 10

30%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

15%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 17

55%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6

19%

Social Sciences 4

13%

Engineering 4

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0