Comparison of Two 16S rRNA Primers (V3–V4 and V4–V5) for Studies of Arctic Microbial Communities

103Citations
Citations of this article
318Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Microbial communities of the Arctic Ocean are poorly characterized in comparison to other aquatic environments as to their horizontal, vertical, and temporal turnover. Yet, recent studies showed that the Arctic marine ecosystem harbors unique microbial community members that are adapted to harsh environmental conditions, such as near-freezing temperatures and extreme seasonality. The gene for the small ribosomal subunit (16S rRNA) is commonly used to study the taxonomic composition of microbial communities in their natural environment. Several primer sets for this marker gene have been extensively tested across various sample sets, but these typically originated from low-latitude environments. An explicit evaluation of primer-set performances in representing the microbial communities of the Arctic Ocean is currently lacking. To select a suitable primer set for studying microbiomes of various Arctic marine habitats (sea ice, surface water, marine snow, deep ocean basin, and deep-sea sediment), we have conducted a performance comparison between two widely used primer sets, targeting different hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA gene (V3–V4 and V4–V5). We observed that both primer sets were highly similar in representing the total microbial community composition down to genus rank, which was also confirmed independently by subgroup-specific catalyzed reporter deposition-fluorescence in situ hybridization (CARD-FISH) counts. Each primer set revealed higher internal diversity within certain bacterial taxonomic groups (e.g., the class Bacteroidia by V3–V4, and the phylum Planctomycetes by V4–V5). However, the V4–V5 primer set provides concurrent coverage of the archaeal domain, a relevant component comprising 10–20% of the community in Arctic deep waters and the sediment. Although both primer sets perform similarly, we suggest the use of the V4–V5 primer set for the integration of both bacterial and archaeal community dynamics in the Arctic marine environment.

References Powered by Scopus

The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools

21402Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data

20026Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Phyloseq: An R Package for Reproducible Interactive Analysis and Graphics of Microbiome Census Data

12891Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Multi-level analysis of the gut–brain axis shows autism spectrum disorder-associated molecular and microbial profiles

77Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Considerations and best practices in animal science 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing microbiome studies

59Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Remarkable characteristics and distinct community of biofilms on the photoaged polyethylene films in riverine microcosms

31Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fadeev, E., Cardozo-Mino, M. G., Rapp, J. Z., Bienhold, C., Salter, I., Salman-Carvalho, V., … Boetius, A. (2021). Comparison of Two 16S rRNA Primers (V3–V4 and V4–V5) for Studies of Arctic Microbial Communities. Frontiers in Microbiology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.637526

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 98

65%

Researcher 42

28%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

4%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58

37%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 54

35%

Environmental Science 27

17%

Immunology and Microbiology 17

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free