The impact of trained radiographers as concurrent readers on performance and reading time of experienced radiologists in the UK Lung Cancer Screening (UKLS) trial

20Citations
Citations of this article
80Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: To compare radiologists’ performance reading CTs independently with their performance using radiographers as concurrent readers in lung cancer screening. Methods: 369 consecutive baseline CTs performed for the UK Lung Cancer Screening (UKLS) trial were double-read by radiologists reading either independently or concurrently with a radiographer. In concurrent reading, the radiologist reviewed radiographer-identified nodules and then detected any additional nodules. Radiologists recorded their independent and concurrent reading times. For each radiologist, sensitivity, average false-positive detections (FPs) per case and mean reading times for each method were calculated. Results: 694 nodules in 246/369 (66.7%) studies comprised the reference standard. Radiologists’ mean sensitivity and average FPs per case both increased with concurrent reading compared to independent reading (90.8 ± 5.6% vs. 77.5 ± 11.2%, and 0.60 ± 0.53 vs. 0.33 ± 0.20, respectively; p < 0.05 for 3/4 and 2/4 radiologists, respectively). The mean reading times per case decreased from 9.1 ± 2.3 min with independent reading to 7.2 ± 1.0 min with concurrent reading, decreasing significantly for 3/4 radiologists (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The majority of radiologists demonstrated improved sensitivity, a small increase in FP detections and a statistically significantly reduced reading time using radiographers as concurrent readers. Key Points: • Radiographers as concurrent readers could improve radiologists’ sensitivity in lung nodule detection. • An increase in false-positive detections with radiographer-assisted concurrent reading occurred. • The false-positive detection rate was still lower than reported for computer-aided detection. • Concurrent reading with radiographers was also faster than single reading. • The time saved per case using concurrently reading radiographers was relatively modest.

References Powered by Scopus

Screening for lung cancer: U.S. preventive services task force recommendation statement

1703Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Pulmonary nodules on multi-detector row CT scans: Performance comparison of radiologists and computer-aided detection

255Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Automated detection of lung nodules in CT scans: Preliminary results

233Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Artificial intelligence in diagnostic imaging: Impact on the radiography profession

135Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Artificial intelligence and radiomics in pulmonary nodule management: current status and future applications

126Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Development and clinical application of deep learning model for lung nodules screening on CT images

60Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nair, A., Screaton, N. J., Holemans, J. A., Jones, D., Clements, L., Barton, B., … Devaraj, A. (2018). The impact of trained radiographers as concurrent readers on performance and reading time of experienced radiologists in the UK Lung Cancer Screening (UKLS) trial. European Radiology, 28(1), 226–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-4903-z

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 19

44%

Professor / Associate Prof. 9

21%

Lecturer / Post doc 9

21%

Researcher 6

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 23

56%

Nursing and Health Professions 14

34%

Social Sciences 3

7%

Energy 1

2%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0