Proximity data-loggers increase the quantity and quality of social network data

40Citations
Citations of this article
169Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Social network analysis is an ideal quantitative tool for advancing our understanding of complex social behaviour. However, this approach is often limited by the challenges of accurately characterizing social structure and measuring network heterogeneity. Technological advances have facilitated the study of social networks, but to date, all such work has focused on large vertebrates. Here, we provide proof of concept for using proximity data-logging to quantify the frequency of social interactions, construct weighted networks and characterize variation in the social behaviour of a lek-breeding bird, the wire-tailed manakin, Pipra filicauda. Our results highlight how this approach can ameliorate the challenges of social network data collection and analysis by concurrently improving data quality and quantity. © 2012 The Royal Society.

References Powered by Scopus

A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks

1730Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Social network analysis of animal behaviour: a promising tool for the study of sociality

649Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Hypothesis testing in animal social networks

309Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Reality mining of animal social systems

200Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Networks and the ecology of parasite transmission: A framework for wildlife parasitology

106Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Proximity as a proxy for interactions: Issues of scale in social network analysis

97Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ryder, T. B., Horton, B. M., Van Den Tillaart, M., De Dios Morales, J., & Moore, I. T. (2012). Proximity data-loggers increase the quantity and quality of social network data. Biology Letters, 8(6), 917–920. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2012.0536

Readers over time

‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2508162432

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 86

65%

Researcher 34

26%

Professor / Associate Prof. 11

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

1%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 96

78%

Environmental Science 19

15%

Social Sciences 4

3%

Medicine and Dentistry 4

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0