Dreams Realized: A Long-Term Program Evaluation of Three Summer Diversity Pipeline Programs

17Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: Pipeline programs are a well-known approach to enhancing health care workforce diversity and reducing health disparities. Few evaluations of pipeline programs include long-term outcome; fewer still, if any explore perceptions of students after completing such programs, to elucidate factors that contribute to successful entry into the health professions. The authors conducted a program evaluation of three summer diversity pipeline programs in the Bronx, NY, investigating both long-term outcomes and participants' hindsight perspectives of the impact of these programs on their career trajectories. Methods: Investigators conducted a cross-sectional, long-term, mixed-methods survey study. The primary and secondary outcomes for the quantitative analysis were matriculation into biomedical programs to pursue MD or PhD degrees and Master's degrees, respectively, and associated demographic factors. Free-text questions explored the most valuable and influential components of the programs; responses were analyzed qualitatively. Results: Of 147 respondents, 107 (73%) were on-track or had entered a doctoral or master's program, achieving either the primary or secondary outcomes, respectively. Components cited as most valuable included clinical experience, mentorship, career exposure, and research opportunities. Three themes were identified from the free-text responses: (1) Dreams realized; (2) Professional identity formation; and (3) Addressing systemic inequities. Conclusions: These three pipeline programs achieved career outcomes similar to published data. Participants' insights highlight the value of relationships, direct exposure to the health professions, and the importance of such programs to address systemic barriers faced. Results can inform criteria both for participant selection, as well as benchmarks used to define individual and programmatic success.

References Powered by Scopus

Using thematic analysis in psychology

110653Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis

1273Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Social cognitive model of career self-management: Toward a unifying view of adaptive career behavior across the life span

786Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Racial, Ethnic, and Sex Diversity Trends in Health Professions Programs from Applicants to Graduates

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Impact of a Multi-Institutional Initiative to Engage Students and Early-Stage Scholars From Underrepresented Racial and Ethnic Minority Groups in HIV Research: The Centers for AIDS Research Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Pathway Initiative

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Perceived Success After Participation in the Summer Health Professions Education Program

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stephenson-Hunter, C., Strelnick, A. H., Rodriguez, N., Stumpf, L. A., Spano, H., & Gonzalez, C. M. (2021). Dreams Realized: A Long-Term Program Evaluation of Three Summer Diversity Pipeline Programs. Health Equity, 5(1), 512–520. https://doi.org/10.1089/heq.2020.0126

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

55%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

27%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

9%

Researcher 1

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 3

33%

Medicine and Dentistry 3

33%

Engineering 2

22%

Environmental Science 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free