Income heterogeneity and environmental Kuznets curve in Africa

20Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis asserts that pollution levels rises as a country develops, but reaches a certain threshold where pollution begins to fall with increasing income. In EKC analysis, the relationship between environmental degradation and income is usually expressed as a quadratic function with turning point occurring at a maximum pollution level. This study seeks to examine the pattern and nature of EKC in Africa and major income groups according to World Bank classification comprising low income, lower middle income and upper middle income in Africa. In ensuring the robustness of our study; the paper proceeded by ascertaining the nature of EKC in all fifty-three countries of Africa in order to confirm the results obtained from basic and augmented EKC model. The study could not validate EKC hypothesis in Africa (combined), low income and upper middle income but empirical and analytical evidences supports the existence of EKC in lower middle income countries. Likewise, evidences from the robustness checks confirmed the findings from the basic and augmented EKC model. The study could not attain a reasonable turning point as there are evidences that Africa could be turning on the EKC at lower levels of income. Also, there is need to strengthen institutions in order to enforce policies that prohibits environmental pollution and ensure pro-poor development agenda.

References Powered by Scopus

2533Citations
2387Readers

Your institution provides access to this article.

1942Citations
868Readers

This article is free to access.

Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ogundipe, A. A., Alege, P. O., & Ogundipe, O. M. (2014). Income heterogeneity and environmental Kuznets curve in Africa. Journal of Sustainable Development, 7(4), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v7n4p165

Readers over time

‘15‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

63%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

21%

Researcher 3

16%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 11

65%

Environmental Science 3

18%

Social Sciences 2

12%

Energy 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0