Digital solidarity, analogue mobilization: An ethnography of the technology-embedded protest networks of the Québec student strike

0Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background This article presents the results of an ethnographic study of the online and offline communities participating in the "Maple Spring" student strike in Québec as a case study for theorizing the trajectory of the technology-embedded social movement. Analysis Analyzing data collected during field visits that include over 50 interviews with participants, community organizers, union representatives, community-media producers, and activists, this article argues that it is the practices of online-offline sharing, belonging, strategizing, and affectively being together that allowed for a hybridized practice of social movements to translate into concrete direct democratic action. Conclusions and implications The social and mobile media uses of the Québec studentstrike participants suggest that the strategy of using mediated exchanges in order to both build community belonging and share information/knowledge can be effective in mobilizing boots-on-the-ground actions as a means of democratic participation and social change for today's hybridized social movements and direct actions.

References Powered by Scopus

Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship

9751Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Principles of critical discourse analysis

2600Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

#Ferguson: Digital protest, hashtag ethnography, and the racial politics of social media in the United States

750Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tewksbury, D. (2018). Digital solidarity, analogue mobilization: An ethnography of the technology-embedded protest networks of the Québec student strike. Canadian Journal of Communication, 43(4), 601–617. https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2018v43n4a3352

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

69%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

31%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 5

42%

Arts and Humanities 4

33%

Business, Management and Accounting 2

17%

Computer Science 1

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 6
References: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 143

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free