ER-targeted Intrabodies Mediating Specific In Vivo Knockdown of Transitory Proteins in Comparison to RNAi

  • Backhaus O
  • Böldicke T
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In animals and mammalian cells, protein function can be analyzed by nucleotide se‐ quence-based methods such as gene knockout, targeted gene disruption, CRISPR/Cas, TALEN, zinc finger nucleases, or the RNAi technique. Alternatively, protein knock‐ down approaches are available based on direct interference of the target protein with the inhibitor. Among protein knockdown techniques, the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) intrabodies are potent molecules for protein knockdown in vitro and in vivo. These molecules are in‐ creasingly used for protein knockdown in living cells and transgenic mice. ER intra‐ body knockdown technique is based on the retention of membrane proteins and secretory proteins inside the ER, mediated by recombinant antibody fragments. In con‐ trast to nucleotide sequence-based methods, the intrabody-mediated knockdown acts only on the posttranslational level. In this review, the ER intrabody technology has been compared with the RNAi techni‐ que on the molecular level. The generation of intrabodies and RNAi has also been dis‐ cussed. Specificity and off-target effects (OTE) of these molecules as well as the therapeutic potential of ER intrabodies and RNAi have been compared.

Figures

  • Figure 1. Principle of the knockdown of transitory proteins using the RNA interference technique. For knockdown of the mRNA of transitory proteins, transfection with a specific shRNA-expressing plasmid is sufficient. Although by using the RNA interference technology all kinds of proteins could be targeted, only knockdown of transitory proteins is illustrated. (1) Specific shRNA is transcribed and processed by the RNase III Dicer-1 enzyme in mammalian cells in order to form the mature siRNA. (2) The Argonaute 2 protein (Ago2) is loaded with the siRNA and forms together with additional proteins the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), which is a multiprotein complex consisting of ef‐ fector (Argonaute proteins), accessory proteins, and si/miRNA. During the loading of the Argonaute protein, one strand of the siRNA duplex is discarded. Next, the RISC complex associates with its target mRNA via complementary base pairing of the siRNA and the target mRNA. In many cases, the recognition site comprises the 3′ untranslated re‐ gions (UTR) of the mRNA. Finally, target binding leads to mRNA degradation or translational inhibition [11]. mRNA degradation is mediated through the endonuclease activity of the Argonaute proteins. (3) As a result of mRNA knock‐ down, the target protein is not expressed on the cell surface [11].
  • Figure 2. Principle of the specific knockdown of transitory proteins with endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-retained in‐ trabodies. In wild-type cells, transitory proteins are transported through the ER and can be further processed (e.g., gly‐ cosylated) in the Golgi apparatus. These proteins could reside in the secretory cell compartments, secreted through the plasma membrane (PM), or become integrated in the PM as a membrane protein. For functional inhibition of these pro‐ teins, transfection with an ER intrabody expressing plasmid is sufficient. The intrabody construct consists of an N-ter‐ minal secretion sequence for the translocation in the ER (leader sequence) and the C-terminal retention signal (KDEL). (1) The intrabody inside of the ER binds to the target protein. This complex of antibody and target protein is further processed and transported through the secretory pathway. (2) In the cis-cisterna of the Golgi stack, the hERD2 receptor binds to the KDEL sequence and (3) initiates the retrograde transport back to the ER compartment. This continuous binding of the intrabody and retrograde transport prevents the target protein to reach its localization where it normal‐ ly acts. (4) The accumulated intrabody–antigen complex in the ER might be transported into the cytoplasm, where it is marked for degradation by the 26S proteasome [12, 13]. Böldicke and Burgdorf have shown that an anti-toll-like recep‐ tor 2 (TLR2) ER intrabody is degraded by the proteasome (unpublished data).
  • Figure 3. Generation of intrabody and RNA interference knockdown constructs. (A) Generation of intrabody knock‐ down vectors. The scFv fragment could be either cloned from hybridoma cell lines or selected from huge human naive phage display libraries. The antibody variable domain of the light chain (VL) and heavy chain (VH) is amplified from cDNA using consensus primer mixtures (1), 5′ adapter-ligated PCR or rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) (2) or with constant domain-specific primer from circularized cDNA (3). The antibody VL and VH genes are assembled as scFv by fusing both domains with a flexible (Gly4Ser)3-linker sequence and cloned into the ER targeting intrabody vec‐ tor. The scFvs are cloned between an upstream secretion signal and a downstream retention sequence (KDEL). Using the phage display system, selected scFvs can directly be cloned into the intrabody vector in one cloning step. Shown is an ER-targeting vector. (B) Generation of siRNA/shRNA/miRNA knockdown vectors. Rational in silico design of siR‐ NA, shRNA, or miRNA mimics using software algorithms like those mentioned in Ref. [37] or in Ref. [38], a recent publication, deduced from the target cDNA. The algorithms are designed to select appropriated sequences by means of empiric criteria. Main criteria are an siRNA length of 19–21 nucleotides (nt) in conjunction with 2 nt overhangs at
  • Table 1. Intrabodies versus siRNA

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Backhaus, O., & Böldicke, T. (2016). ER-targeted Intrabodies Mediating Specific In Vivo Knockdown of Transitory Proteins in Comparison to RNAi. In RNA Interference. InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/62103

Readers over time

‘16‘18‘19‘21‘2200.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

80%

Researcher 1

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

33%

Chemistry 2

33%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 1

17%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0