Past and Current Status of Scientific, Academic, and Research Fraud

1Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In the quest to advance knowledge, researchers publish approximately 2 million scientific articles each year, in close to 30,000 peer-reviewed journals. Even though there was hardly a time when science was more questioned, distorted, and defamed, this is still the closest thing to the established body of knowledge for universities, academic laboratories, and other government and private organizations and agencies worldwide. Are plagiarism, fraud, and misconduct indeed infiltrating and rotting the revered shrines of wisdom? Or is alleged scientific decay a consequence of relatively few overambitious, incompetent, or truly rogue researchers, who sooner or later are identified and banned from the community? In the distant past, fraud was often in the eye of the beholder. As experimental design was rarely adequate, measuring instruments were primitive or nonexistent, and modern statistics were lacking, conflicts were often decided by the strongest side, namely, the one backed by the authorities, not necessarily the correct one. Fortunately, much institutional advance has occurred, and current fraudsters exceptionally get away with it. This chapter briefly reviews the state of the art in academic research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Faintuch, J., & Faintuch, S. (2022). Past and Current Status of Scientific, Academic, and Research Fraud. In Integrity of Scientific Research: Fraud, Misconduct and Fake News in the Academic, Medical and Social Environment (pp. 3–8). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99680-2_1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free