Effects of age on validity of self-reported height, weight, and body mass index: Findings from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994

815Citations
Citations of this article
210Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective To compare self-reported to measured heights and weights of adults examined in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III), and to determine to what extent body mass index (BMI) calculated from self-reported heights and weights affects estimates of overweight prevalence compared with BMI calculated from measured values. Design A complex sample design was used in NHANES III to obtain a nationally representative sample of the US civilian, noninstitutionalized population. During household interviews, survey respondents were asked their height and weight. Trained health technicians subsequently measured height and weight using standardized procedures and equipment. Subjects The analytical sample consisted of 7,772 men and 8,801 women 20 years old and older. Statistical analyses performed Only persons with measured and self-reported heights and weights were included in the analysis, and statistical sampling weights were applied, t Tests, Pearson product moment correlation coefficients, sensitivity, and specificity analyses were used to determine the validity of self-reported measurements and prevalence estimates of overweight, defined as BMI of 25 or greater. Results Age is an important factor in classifying weight, height, BMI, and overweight from self-reports. Statistically significant differences were found for the mean error (measured-self-reported values) for height and BMI that were notably larger for older age groups. For example, the mean error for height ranged from 2.92 to 4.50 cm for women and from 3.06 to 4.29 cm for men, 70 years and older. Despite the high correlation between measured and self-reported data, the prevalence of overweight calculated from measured values was higher than that calculated from self-reported values among older adults. When calculated with self-reported height, BMI was one unit lower than when calculated from measured height for persons ≥70 years. Specificity was high but sensitivity decreased with increasing age cohorts. Regression equations are provided to determine actual height from self-reported values for older adults. Conclusion/Applications Self-reported heights and weights can be used with younger adults, but they have limitations for older adults, ages ≥60 years. In research studies and in clinical settings involving older adults, failure to measure height and weight can result in subsequent misclassification of overweight status. Therefore, registered dietitians are encouraged to obtained a measured weight and height using a calibrated scale and stadiometer.

References Powered by Scopus

The accuracy of self-reported weights

529Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The reliability and validity of self-reported weight and height

410Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Underestimation of relative weight by use of self-reported height and weight

305Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Body-mass index and incidence of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies

4226Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The obesity epidemic in the United States - Gender, age, socioeconomic, racial/ethnic, and geographic characteristics: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis

2209Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index: A new index for evaluating at-risk elderly medical patients

1572Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kuczmarski, M. F., Kuczmarski, R. J., & Najjar, M. (2001). Effects of age on validity of self-reported height, weight, and body mass index: Findings from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 101(1), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8223(01)00008-6

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2507142128

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 82

58%

Researcher 27

19%

Professor / Associate Prof. 24

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 8

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 62

57%

Social Sciences 18

17%

Psychology 15

14%

Nursing and Health Professions 13

12%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0