A comparison of conventional with ultrasonic liposuction in gynaecomastia surgery

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A wide range of surgical techniques have been described for gynaecomastia treatment including various forms of liposuction, open excision, skin reduction and combinations. Over the last two decades, conventional liposuction, also known as suction-assisted lipectomy, and ultrasound- assisted liposuction (UAL) have been demonstrated to be effective treatment options. In particular, there has been growing interest in UAL. Although high complications rates were reported in some early studies, subsequent reports have suggested that UAL is a more effective treatment modality versus traditional liposuction. This chapter compares the roles of conventional liposuction and ultrasonic liposuction in gynaecomastia surgery. We outline the salient features and principles of each technique with subsequent review of the literature regarding safety and postoperative outcomes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Malata, C. M., & Wong, K. Y. (2016). A comparison of conventional with ultrasonic liposuction in gynaecomastia surgery. In Liposuction: Principles and Practice, Second Edition (pp. 511–523). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48903-1_50

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free