Interference of sample size on multicollinearity diagnosis in path analysis

14Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The objective of this work was to evaluate the interference of sample size on multicollinearity diagnosis in path analysis. From the analyses of productive traits of cherry tomato, two Pearson correlation matrices were obtained, one with severe multicollinearity and the other with weak multicollinearity. Sixtysix sample sizes were designed, and from the amplitude of the bootstrap confidence interval, it was observed that sample size interfered on multicollinearity diagnosis. When sample size was small, the imprecision of the diagnostic criteria estimates interfered with multicollinearity diagnosis in the matrix with weak multicollinearity.

References Powered by Scopus

Multicollinearity in path analysis: A simple method to reduce its effects

57Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Multicollinearity in path analysis of maize (Zea mays L.)

48Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Multivariate nonnormality and multicollinearity in path analysis in corn

29Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

City classification for municipal solid waste prediction in mainland China based on K-means clustering

30Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Drought-adapted maize line based on morphophysiological selection index

18Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Prediction of the rate of penetration using logistic regression algorithm of machine learning model

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sari, B. G., Lúcio, A. D. C., Olivoto, T., Krysczun, D. K., Tischler, A. L., & Drebes, L. (2018). Interference of sample size on multicollinearity diagnosis in path analysis. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, 53(6), 769–773. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2018000600014

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 16

64%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

20%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

8%

Researcher 2

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 16

64%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8

32%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0