A Theory of Stock Exchange Competition and Innovation: Will the Market Fix the Market?

5Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Will stock exchanges innovate to address latency arbitrage and the arms race for speed? This paper models how exchanges compete in the mod-ern electronic era and how this shapes incentives for market-design innovation. In the status quo, exchange trading fees are competitive, but exchanges earn economic rents from selling speed. These rents create a wedge between private and social incentives to innovate and support the persistence of an inefficient market design in equilibrium of a market-design adoption game. We discuss implications for policy and insights for the literatures on market design, innovation, and platforms.

References Powered by Scopus

Bid, ask and transaction prices in a specialist market with heterogeneously informed traders

2925Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Chicken & egg: Competition among intermediation service providers

1085Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Information Effects on the Bid‐Ask Spread

983Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Trust at Scale: The Economic Limits of Cryptocurrencies and Blockchains

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Dynamic Mechanisms of R&D Innovation in Chinese Multinational Corporations: The Impact of Government Support, Market Competition and Entrepreneurial Spirit

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Competition and Information Leakage

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Budish, E., Lee, R. S., & Shim, J. J. (2024). A Theory of Stock Exchange Competition and Innovation: Will the Market Fix the Market? Journal of Political Economy, 132(4), 1209–1246. https://doi.org/10.1086/727284

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

62%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

23%

Researcher 2

15%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8

67%

Social Sciences 2

17%

Energy 1

8%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0