Nitrate sinks and sources as controls of spatio-temporal water quality dynamics in an agricultural headwater catchment

19Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Several controls are known to affect water quality of stream networks during flow recession periods, such as solute leaching processes, surface water-groundwater interactions as well as biogeochemical in-stream turnover processes. Throughout the stream network, combinations of specific water and solute export rates and local in-stream conditions overlay the biogeochemical signals from upstream sections. Therefore, upstream sections can be considered functional units which could be distinguished and ordered regarding their relative contribution to nutrient dynamics at the catchment outlet. Based on snapshot sampling of flow and nitrate concentrations along the stream in an agricultural headwater during the summer flow recession period, we determined spatial and temporal patterns of water quality for the whole stream. A data-driven, in-stream-mixing-and-removal model was developed and applied for analysing the spatio-temporal in-stream retention processes and their effect on the spatio-temporal fluxes of nitrate from subcatchments. Thereby, we have been able to distinguish quantitatively between nitrate sinks, sources per stream reaches, and subcatchments, and thus we could disentangle the overlay of nitrate sink and source signals. For nitrate sources, we determined their permanent and temporal impact on stream water quality and for nitrate sinks, we found increasing nitrate removal efficiencies from upstream to downstream. Our results highlight the importance of distinct nitrate source locations within the watershed for in-stream concentrations and in-stream removal processes, respectively. Thus, our findings contribute to the development of a more dynamic perception of water quality in streams and rivers concerning ecological and sustainable water resource management.

Figures

  • Figure 1. Topographical map of the Löchernbach catchment. The sharp elevation steps in the map represent the vineyard terraces within the catchment. Locations of active drainpipes and stream reaches are marked (dashed lines) with the names referred to throughout the paper.
  • Table 1. Overview on the measurements and samples obtained during June and August 2012. The number of samples taken at a specific location is given in Arabic numerals. The number of sampling locations is given in Roman numerals.
  • Figure 2. Observed spatio-temporal variations in in-stream and drainpipe nitrate concentrations along the stream network for sampling campaigns No. 1 (27 June 2012) and No. 10 (9 August 2012) and during five sampling campaigns at Reach 1 (inset).
  • Table 2. Overview on stream reach residence times τ and stream reach specific parameters applied in Eqs. (9) to (12).
  • Figure 3. (a) Simulated stream network discharge patterns Qi for all days. Inset in (a): comparison of calculated (Qi ) and measured discharges (Qi,obs). (b) Calculated patterns of relative discharges fnet,i for all days. Sampling campaigns No. 1–No. 10 are colour-coded from blue to red. Dashed lines (a, b) symbolize the positions of the drainpipes. Shaded bars (a) represent the locations of salt dilution gauging.
  • Figure 4. (a) Estimated (ki ) and empirical (ki,obs) in-stream nitrate removal rates. (b) Observed (Ci,obs symbols) and calculated (Ci lines) in-stream nitrate concentration patterns for all days. Sampling campaigns No. 1–No. 10 are colour-coded from blue to red. Dashed lines symbolize the positions of the drainpipes. (c) Comparison of modelled and observed in-stream nitrate concentrations for campaigns No. 1 (blue circles) and No. 10 (red diamonds).
  • Figure 5. (a) In-stream nitrate loads per source for all days (the black line presents cumulative nitrate load emissions without instream removal). (b) Maximum, median and minimum in-stream nitrate load removal per source relative (%) to the total emitted nitrate load.
  • Figure 6. (a) Hierarchy and range of nitrate loads per source ranked by their median nitrate load emission. (b) Hierarchy and range of in-stream nitrate removal rates ki per reach sorted from upstream to downstream. (c) Range of areal uptake rates Ui per reach sorted from upstream to downstream. Boxplots present the 0.01, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75 and 0.99 quantiles of each measure.

References Powered by Scopus

Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogen

4646Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Regional nitrogen budgets and riverine N and P fluxes for the drainages to the North Atlantic Ocean: Natural and human influences

1459Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Stream denitrification across biomes and its response to anthropogenic nitrate loading

1111Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Local determinants influencing stream water quality

145Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Beyond binary baseflow separation: a delayed-flow index for multiple streamflow contributions

46Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Your work is my boundary condition!: Challenges and approaches for a closer collaboration between hydrologists and hydrogeologists

43Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schuetz, T., Gascuel-Odoux, C., Durand, P., & Weiler, M. (2016). Nitrate sinks and sources as controls of spatio-temporal water quality dynamics in an agricultural headwater catchment. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 20(2), 843–857. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-843-2016

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 20

56%

Researcher 11

31%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 18

56%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 8

25%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

13%

Engineering 2

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0