Process simulation framework design and validation with grinding systems

0Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Process Industrial & their complex control operations require comprehensive simulation software systems for modeling plant dynamics and analyzing gaps and to achieve optimal control efficiency. These models support in training plant engineers on various process scenarios in controlled pseudo real time environment. Higher degree of model designing customization, flexibility, scalability, cost efficiency and domain agnostic solution features, are the desired characteristics of any process simulation framework. This paper formulates prototype design of an integrated generic process simulator platform and its components, enabling intuitive and interactive representation of intelligent model formats, facts, knowledge, rules & behaviors. The benefits range from safer process training, analysis / synthesis of controller models; control optimization and theoretical learning. The simulation performance of proposed framework is verified through material fineness control modeling of rotary vertical grinding mill. The adaptive leaning features, with hybrid prediction model validations results in the simulation accuracy and results are compared with prevalent systems.

References Powered by Scopus

A survey of industrial model predictive control technology

4425Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Statistical Monitoring of Multistage, Multiphase Batch Processes

246Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Artificial intelligence for monitoring and supervisory control of process systems

195Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sridevi, S. (2019). Process simulation framework design and validation with grinding systems. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 9(1), 2861–2869. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.A1101.109119

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

33%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

33%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 2

67%

Chemical Engineering 1

33%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free