Performance of fourier domain vs time domain optical coherence tomography

  • Leitgeb R
  • Hitzenberger C
  • Fercher A
1.9kCitations
Citations of this article
831Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this article we present a detailed discussion of noise sources in Fourier Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (FDOCT) setups. The performance of FDOCT with charge coupled device (CCD) cameras is compared to current standard time domain OCT systems. We describe how to measure sensitivity in the case of FDOCT and confirm the theoretically obtained values. It is shown that FDOCT systems have a large sensitivity advantage and allow for sensitivities well above 80dB, even in situations with low light levels and high speed detection.

References Powered by Scopus

Measurement of intraocular distances by backscattering spectral interferometry

1291Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

In vivo human retinal imaging by Fourier domain optical coherence tomography

904Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

"Coherence radar" and "spectral radar" - New tools for dermatological diagnosis

700Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Sensitivity advantage of swept source and Fourier domain optical coherence tomography

1772Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Split-spectrum amplitude-decorrelation angiography with optical coherence tomography

1675Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Optical coherence tomography angiography

1317Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Leitgeb, R., Hitzenberger, C., & Fercher, A. (2003). Performance of fourier domain vs time domain optical coherence tomography. Optics Express, 11(8), 889. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.11.000889

Readers over time

‘09‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250255075100

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 421

69%

Researcher 122

20%

Professor / Associate Prof. 58

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 7

1%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 294

49%

Physics and Astronomy 190

32%

Medicine and Dentistry 93

16%

Computer Science 22

4%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0