Treatment of Venous Thrombosis with Intravenous Unfractionated Heparin Administered in the Hospital as Compared with Subcutaneous Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Administered at Home

  • Koopman M
  • Prandoni P
  • Piovella F
  • et al.
1.2kCitations
Citations of this article
142Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background. An intravenous course of standard (unfractionated) heparin with the dose adjusted to prolong the activated partial-thromboplastin time to a desired length is the standard initial in-hospital treatment for patients with deep-vein thrombosis, but fixed-dose subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin appears to be as effective and safe. Because the latter treatment can be given on an outpatient basis, we compared the two treatments in symptomatic outpatients with proximal-vein thrombosis but no signs of pulmonary embolism. Methods. We randomly assigned patients to adjusted-dose intravenous standard heparin administered in the hospital (198 patients) or fixed-dose subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin administered at home, when feasible (202 patients). We compared the treatments with respect to recurrent venous thromboembolism, major bleeding, quality of life, and costs. Results. Seventeen of the 198 patients who received standard heparin (8.6 percent) and 14 of the 202 patients who received low-molecular-weight heparin (6.9 percent) had recurrent thromboembolism (difference, 1.7 percentage points; 95 percent confidence interval, -3.6 to 6.9). Major bleeding occurred in four patients assigned to standard heparin (2.0 percent) and one patient assigned to low-molecular-weight heparin (0.5 percent; difference, 1.5 percentage points; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.7 to 2.7). Quality of life improved in both groups. Physical activity and social functioning were better in the patients assigned to low-molecular-weight heparin. Among the patients in that group, 36 percent were never admitted to the hospital at all, and 40 percent were discharged early. This treatment was associated with a mean reduction in hospital days of 67 percent, ranging from 29 percent to 86 percent in the various study centers. Conclusions. In patients with proximal-vein thrombosis, treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin at home is feasible, effective, and safe. ©1996, Massachusetts Medical Society.

References Powered by Scopus

The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients: Results of the harvard medical practice study II

3087Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Value of the Ventilation/Perfusion Scan in Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Results of the Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED)

0
2753Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Resistance to activated protein c as a basis for venous thrombosis

1240Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: Antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines

3304Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (8th edition)

1939Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Management of massive and submassive pulmonary embolism, iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis, and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: A scientific statement from the american heart association

1868Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Koopman, M. M. W., Prandoni, P., Piovella, F., Ockelford, P. A., Brandjes, D. P. M., van der Meer, J., … Büller, H. R. (1996). Treatment of Venous Thrombosis with Intravenous Unfractionated Heparin Administered in the Hospital as Compared with Subcutaneous Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Administered at Home. New England Journal of Medicine, 334(11), 682–687. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199603143341102

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 45

53%

Researcher 20

24%

Professor / Associate Prof. 18

21%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 79

85%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 6

6%

Nursing and Health Professions 5

5%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

3%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free