Methods to Include Environmental Impacts in Health Economic Evaluations and Health Technology Assessments: A Scoping Review

7Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: The environmental impacts of healthcare are important factors that should be considered during health technology assessments. This study aims to summarize the evidence that exists about methods to include environmental impacts in health economic evaluations and health technology assessments. Methods: We identified records for screening using an existing scoping review and a systematic search of academic databases and gray literature up to September 2023. We screened the identified records for eligibility and extracted data using a narrative synthesis approach. The review was conducted following the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. Results: We identified 2898 records and assessed the full text of 114, of which 54 were included in this review. Ten methods were identified to include environmental impacts in health economic evaluations and health technology assessments. Methods included converting environmental impacts to dollars or disability-adjusted life years and including them in a cost-effectiveness, cost-utility, or cost-benefit analysis, calculating an incremental carbon footprint effectiveness ratio or incremental carbon footprint cost ratio, incorporating impacts as one criteria of a multi-criteria decision analysis, and freely considering impacts during health technology assessment deliberation processes. Conclusions: Methods to include environmental impacts in health economic evaluations and health technology assessments exist but have not been tested for widespread use by health technology assessment agencies. Further research and implementation work is needed to determine which method can best aid decision makers to choose low environmental impact healthcare interventions.

References Powered by Scopus

PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation

20646Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews

1337Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The 2022 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: health at the mercy of fossil fuels

783Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Methods to Include Environmental Impacts in Health Economic Evaluations and Health Technology Assessments: A Scoping Review

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Assessing the Carbon Footprint of Telemedicine: A Systematic Review

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cost of Carbon in the Total Cost of a Healthcare Procedure: Example of Micro-Costing Study in a French Setting

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Williams, J. T. W., Bell, K. J. L., Morton, R. L., & Dieng, M. (2024, June 1). Methods to Include Environmental Impacts in Health Economic Evaluations and Health Technology Assessments: A Scoping Review. Value in Health. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2024.02.019

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

55%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

18%

Researcher 2

18%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 4

40%

Medicine and Dentistry 3

30%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

20%

Chemistry 1

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free