Weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation

12Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation is challenging for the ICU team in terms of shortening time of ventilation via endotracheal tube in order to improve the patient’s prognosis by early extubation. Thereby prolonged mechanical ventilation (> 14 days), which is associated with risk of tracheotomy and prolonged weaning, shall be avoided. This article will give an overview about weaning categories, causes for weaning failure and strategies to overcome this problem. In the last part we will cover concepts in the process of prolonged weaning including discharge management with invasive mechanical ventilation.

References Powered by Scopus

Efficacy and safety of a paired sedation and ventilator weaning protocol for mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care (Awakening and Breathing Controlled trial): a randomised controlled trial

1625Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Weaning from mechanical ventilation

1467Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Official ERS/ATS clinical practice guidelines: Noninvasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure

1150Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Factors associated with extubation failure in an intensive care unit: a case-control study*

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effects of structured protocolized physical therapy on the duration of mechanical ventilation in patients with prolonged weaning

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Surgical versus non-surgical treatment of flail chest: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Geiseler, J., & Westhoff, M. (2021). Weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation. Medizinische Klinik - Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin, 116(8), 715–726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-021-00858-5

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

50%

Researcher 2

50%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 5

45%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

36%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

9%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 1

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free