Risk analysis of islamic state (Is) network development in southeast asia based on 3d matrix

6Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The threat of terror in Southeast Asia has been currently divided into three generations of terror: Al-Qaeda terror network, ISIS terror network and IS terror network.This study aims at providing a risk analysis on the development of the Islamic State network in Southeast Asia. This study employed Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) approach, TOPSIS. The AHP method is used to give weight to risk identification criteria. The TOPSIS method is used to provide the value analysis of threats, vulnerability, and impact in order to determine the threat-based risk level assessment, vulnerability, and the impact of the TOPSIS calculation results. The risk analysis of the development of Islamic State in Southeast Asia resulted three countries were categorized in the category of Low: Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand. Indonesia has the value of risk factor of 0.170; Malaysia has the value of risk factor of 0.088 and Thailand has the value of risk factor of 0.176. On the other hand, the Philippines has the value of risk factor of 0.351 in the category of Guarded.

References Powered by Scopus

How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process

7199Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation

1036Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effect of climate change on seasonal monsoon in Asia and its impact on the variability of monsoon rainfall in Southeast Asia

441Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Octavian, A., Widjayanto, J., Putra, I. N., Susilo, A. K., & Suharyo, O. S. (2020). Risk analysis of islamic state (Is) network development in southeast asia based on 3d matrix. International Journal of Operations and Quantitative Management, 26(2), 195–223. https://doi.org/10.46970/2020.26.3.3

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 3

60%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

20%

Researcher 1

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Chemical Engineering 1

25%

Computer Science 1

25%

Social Sciences 1

25%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free