Harnessing the Power of Genomics to Secure the Future of Seafood

188Citations
Citations of this article
384Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Best use of scientific knowledge is required to maintain the fundamental role of seafood in human nutrition. While it is acknowledged that genomic-based methods allow the collection of powerful data, their value to inform fisheries management, aquaculture, and biosecurity applications remains underestimated. We review genomic applications of relevance to the sustainable management of seafood resources, illustrate the benefits of, and identify barriers to their integration. We conclude that the value of genomic information towards securing the future of seafood does not need to be further demonstrated. Instead, we need immediate efforts to remove structural roadblocks and focus on ways that support integration of genomic-informed methods into management and production practices. We propose solutions to pave the way forward. Advancements of genetic technologies now allow the collection of genome-wide data in nonmodel species in a cost-effective manner. These genomic-informed technologies allow addressing a comprehensive spectrum of needs and applications relevant to fisheries, aquaculture, and biosecurity. Genomics tools also improve our understanding of how aquatic organisms adapt and respond to the environment, and improve our ability to monitor environmental variation and exploited species. Genomic approaches are now rapidly replacing traditional genetic markers, but their application in fisheries and aquaculture management has stagnated when compared to agriculture where they have long been used for improved production. There is no reason to further delay the application of genomic tools in fisheries management and aquaculture production.

Figures

  • Figure 1. Genetics versus Genomics. Applications are italicised. Applications placed within the overlap area between genetics and genomics can be conducted with both methods, but always achieve finer resolution using genomic technologies. Some applications potentially relevant to either fisheries or aquaculture are only possible with genomic methods, and include ‘genomic selection’, ‘gene expression’, and ‘epigenetic responses’. Some applications are particular important (but not exclusively) for either fisheries or aquaculture. The ability to screen for genome wide single nucleotide polymorphism markers and then to develop small markers panels most powerful for the questions at hand (e.g., species or ecotype identification, stock structure, parentage-based analysis, and mixed-stocks analysis) is only possible with the use of genomic technologies. The price for typing a few 10–100s of markers compared to 1000s of markers decreases on a per marker basis.

References Powered by Scopus

Rebuilding Global Fisheries

1768Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The problems with hybrids: Setting conservation guidelines

1494Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Population diversity and the portfolio effect in an exploited species

1206Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Harnessing genomics to fast-track genetic improvement in aquaculture

342Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Aquatic Landscape Genomics and Environmental Effects on Genetic Variation

104Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A practical introduction to Random Forest for genetic association studies in ecology and evolution

101Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bernatchez, L., Wellenreuther, M., Araneda, C., Ashton, D. T., Barth, J. M. I., Beacham, T. D., … Withler, R. E. (2017, September 1). Harnessing the Power of Genomics to Secure the Future of Seafood. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2017.06.010

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25020406080

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 132

54%

Researcher 83

34%

Professor / Associate Prof. 20

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 9

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 148

62%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 51

21%

Environmental Science 35

15%

Computer Science 6

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0