We’re Miles Apart: Disproportionate Deductions from Wages, Industrial Action and Human Rights

  • Mead D
0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article sets out a human rights-based critique of one aspect of the common law wage/work bargain: the rule that entitles employers to deduct an entire week’s pay from those taking action short of strike, and who thereby perform most, but not all, of their contractual duties. It makes the case that that rule, established in Miles v Wakefield MDC and Wiluszynski v Tower Hamlets over 35 years ago, constitutes a disproportionate interference with an employee’s right to strike and to take industrial action, under Article 11 of the ECHR. The article shows how such cases might be brought, depending on whether an employee is in the public or private sector and iterates the argument for implying a duty of ‘rights-obedience’ into the contract—either as a free-standing duty or as part of an expansion of the duty of mutual trust and confidence—as a corrective.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mead, D. (2023). We’re Miles Apart: Disproportionate Deductions from Wages, Industrial Action and Human Rights. Industrial Law Journal, 52(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwac037

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free