Equidad de género en la atención de la salud en la infancia

1Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We present the most important outcomes of the UBACyT research "Gender fairness in the quality of health care for boys and girls", aimed at identifying the way in which health care professionals who attend to boys/girls have assimilated the gender perspective in their practice. It was an exploratory-descriptive study, using qualitative methods for data collection and analysis. We conducted thirty-four interviews to members of the interdisciplinary health care teams who attend to boys and girls from different pediatric units of public hospitals, private clinics and community hospitals of the City of Buenos Aires (Argentina). Among the results, we found that there is an unfair treatment across gender in terms of the quality of health care, which have to do with the theoretical framework of the professionals, something that could bias their decision making.

Author supplied keywords

References Powered by Scopus

Fundamental elements of the quality of care: a simple framework

542Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Gender in Medical Encounters: An Analysis of Physician and Patient Communication in a Primary Care Setting

342Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Gender differences in physician-patient communication: Evidence from pediatric visits

91Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Post-patriarchal, Post-heteronormative, and Postcolonial Psychoanalysis: Psychoanalysis for All

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tajer, D., Reid, G., Gaba, M., Cuadra, M. E., Lo Russo, A., Salvo, I., & Solis, M. (2015). Equidad de género en la atención de la salud en la infancia. Psicoperspectivas. Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Valparaiso. https://doi.org/10.5027/PSICOPERSPECTIVAS-VOL14-ISSUE1-FULLTEXT-503

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

50%

Researcher 4

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 7

44%

Social Sciences 4

25%

Medicine and Dentistry 3

19%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

13%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0