Reflections on experimentalist governance

28Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article critically engages with Sabel and Zeitlin's important notion of experimentalist governance (EG). It is cast as a "recursive process of provisional goal-setting and revision based on learning from the comparison of alternative approaches to advancing them in different contexts." This is a useful heuristic device to capture policymaking and implementation in complex, dynamic, and highly diverse political entities. This article discusses the micro-foundations underpinning EG, how it relates to hierarchical modes of governing, and how well it captures the distinctive traits of the EU. It also discusses EG from a democratic perspective. In democratic terms EG is understood as a form of direct deliberative polyarchy. This article notes that the question of EG's contribution to democratization cannot, however, be adequately addressed unless we pay more systematic attention to representation and representative democracy. © 2012 Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.

References Powered by Scopus

The asymmetry of European integration, or why the EU cannot be a 'social market economy'

425Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Experimentalist Governance

311Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Multilevel Parliamentary Field: A framework for theorizing representative democracy in the EU

175Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Experimentalism in the EU: Common ground and persistent differences

102Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Experimentalist governance in the EU: The emperor's new clothes?

40Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Experimentalist governance: An introduction

39Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fossum, J. E. (2012). Reflections on experimentalist governance. Regulation and Governance, 6(3), 394–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01158.x

Readers over time

‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 26

68%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

16%

Researcher 6

16%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 25

71%

Business, Management and Accounting 4

11%

Environmental Science 3

9%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0