Paradoxical calls: The opposite signaling role of sound frequency across bird species

63Citations
Citations of this article
94Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The behavioral literature contains inconsistent results on the function of sound frequency (pitch) across species, offering an unexplored opportunity to investigate evolutionary diversification of communication systems. I review those results for birds, where about half the studied species use lower than average frequency (LAF) as a relevant sexual signal, and the remaining species use higher than average frequency (HAF) for the same functions. This variation appears nonrandom with respect to putative causal factors, suggesting that advertising body size determines which species use LAF as a sexual signal. I evaluate different hypotheses to explain why the remaining species use HAF instead. Integrating tests of alternative hypotheses on focal species will be required to demonstrate the causes for this divergence in communication systems. © The Author 2011.

References Powered by Scopus

Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits

1731Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Armaments and ornaments: An evolutionary explanation of traits of dual utility

669Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Bird song, ecology and speciation

448Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Songs of the city: Noise-dependent spectral plasticity in the acoustic phenotype of urban birds

251Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Male Songbird Indicates Body Size with Low-Pitched Advertising Songs

70Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Phenotypic plasticity affects the response of a sexually selected trait to anthropogenic noise

68Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cardoso, G. C. (2012). Paradoxical calls: The opposite signaling role of sound frequency across bird species. Behavioral Ecology, 23(2), 237–241. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arr200

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 47

66%

Researcher 19

27%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

6%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

1%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 67

88%

Environmental Science 7

9%

Computer Science 1

1%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

1%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free