Open courseware and shared knowledge in higher education

13Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Most college and university campuses in the United States and much of the developed world today maintain one, two, or several learning management systems (LMSs), which are courseware products that provide students and faculty with Web-based tools to manage course-related applications. Since the mid-1990s, two predominant models of Web courseware management systems have emerged: commercial and noncommercial. Some of the commercial products available today were created in academia as noncommercial but have since become commercially encumbered. Other products remain noncommercial but are struggling to survive in a world of fierce commercial competition. This article argues for an ethics of pedagogy in higher education that would be based on the guiding assumptions of the non- proprietary, peer-to-peer, open-source software movement.

References Powered by Scopus

MERLOT: A faculty-focused web site of educational resources

34Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Utah virtual lab: JAVA interactivity for teaching science and statistics on line

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Quantitative analysis of learning object repositories

87Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Open Courseware Movement in Higher Education: Unmasking Power and Raising Questions about the Movement's Democratic Potential

59Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Predicting student outcomes using digital logs of learning behaviors: Review, current standards, and suggestions for future work

27Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Malloy, T. E., Jensen, G. C., Regan, A., & Reddick, M. (2002). Open courseware and shared knowledge in higher education. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 34(2), 200–203. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195443

Readers over time

‘09‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

47%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

27%

Researcher 5

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 10

42%

Computer Science 8

33%

Psychology 4

17%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0