Engineered nanomaterials: Toward effective safety management in research laboratories

27Citations
Citations of this article
96Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: It is still unknown which types of nanomaterials and associated doses represent an actual danger to humans and environment. Meanwhile, there is consensus on applying the precautionary principle to these novel materials until more information is available. To deal with the rapid evolution of research, including the fast turnover of collaborators, a user-friendly and easy-to-apply risk assessment tool offering adequate preventive and protective measures has to be provided. Results: Based on new information concerning the hazards of engineered nanomaterials, we improved a previously developed risk assessment tool by following a simple scheme to gain in efficiency. In the first step, using a logical decision tree, one of the three hazard levels, from H1 to H3, is assigned to the nanomaterial. Using a combination of decision trees and matrices, the second step links the hazard with the emission and exposure potential to assign one of the three nanorisk levels (Nano 3 highest risk; Nano 1 lowest risk) to the activity. These operations are repeated at each process step, leading to the laboratory classification. The third step provides detailed preventive and protective measures for the determined level of nanorisk. Conclusions: We developed an adapted simple and intuitive method for nanomaterial risk management in research laboratories. It allows classifying the nanoactivities into three levels, additionally proposing concrete preventive and protective measures and associated actions. This method is a valuable tool for all the participants in nanomaterial safety. The users experience an essential learning opportunity and increase their safety awareness. Laboratory managers have a reliable tool to obtain an overview of the operations involving nanomaterials in their laboratories; this is essential, as they are responsible for the employee safety, but are sometimes unaware of the works performed. Bringing this risk to a three-band scale (like other types of risks such as biological, radiation, chemical, etc.) facilitates the management for occupational health and safety specialists. Institutes and school managers can obtain the necessary information to implement an adequate safety management system. Having an easy-to-use tool enables a dialog between all these partners, whose semantic and priorities in terms of safety are often different.

References Powered by Scopus

Electron-electron and electron-hole interactions in small semiconductor crystallites: The size dependence of the lowest excited electronic state

4776Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mechanisms in the pathogenesis of asbestosis and silicosis

832Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Asbestos, carbon nanotubes and the pleural mesothelium: A review of the hypothesis regarding the role of long fibre retention in the parietal pleura, inflammation and mesothelioma

782Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Laboratory synthesis of C<inf>3</inf>S on the kilogram scale

46Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Experimental Insights into Partial Cation Exchange Reactions for Synthesizing Heterostructured Metal Sulfide Nanocrystals

43Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Review of (Q)SAR models for regulatory assessment of nanomaterials risks

43Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Groso, A., Petri-Fink, A., Rothen-Rutishauser, B., Hofmann, H., & Meyer, T. (2016). Engineered nanomaterials: Toward effective safety management in research laboratories. Journal of Nanobiotechnology, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-016-0169-x

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 40

71%

Researcher 10

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 19

53%

Materials Science 7

19%

Nursing and Health Professions 5

14%

Medicine and Dentistry 5

14%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 113

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0