Understanding the key risks in construction projects in China

648Citations
Citations of this article
1.2kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to understand the key risks in construction projects in China and to develop strategies to manage them. Risks were prioritized according to their significance of influences on typical project objectives in terms of cost, time, quality, safety and environmental sustainability, and then scrutinized from a joint perspective of project stakeholders and life cycle. Postal questionnaire surveys were used to collect data, based on which a total of 25 key risks were ascertained. These risks were compared with the findings of a parallel survey in the Australian construction industry context to highlight the unique risks associated with construction projects in China. Strategies to manage the risks were sought from the perspectives of project stakeholders and life cycle and in light of the Chinese construction culture. It is concluded that clients, designers and government bodies should take the responsibility to manage their relevant risks and work cooperatively from the feasibility phase onwards to address potential risks in time; contractors and subcontractors with robust construction and management knowledge should be employed to minimize construction risks and carry out safe, efficient and quality construction activities. © 2007 Elsevier Ltd and IPMA.

Figures

References Powered by Scopus

808Citations
1108Readers
Get full text

Identifying root causes of construction accidents

519Citations
440Readers
Get full text
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zou, P. X. W., Zhang, G., & Wang, J. (2007). Understanding the key risks in construction projects in China. International Journal of Project Management, 25(6), 601–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.03.001

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2504590135180

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 495

79%

Lecturer / Post doc 59

9%

Researcher 39

6%

Professor / Associate Prof. 32

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 423

68%

Business, Management and Accounting 146

24%

Environmental Science 25

4%

Social Sciences 24

4%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0