Explaining cognitive phenomena with internal representations: A mechanistic perspective

33Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Despite the fact that the notion of internal representation has - at least according to some - a fundamental role to play in the sciences of the mind, not only has its explanatory utility been under attack for a while now, but it also remains unclear what criteria should an explanation of a given cognitive phenomenon meet to count as a (truly, genuinely, nontrivially, etc.) representational explanation in the first place. The aim of this article is to propose a solution to this latter problem. I will assume that representational explanations should be construed as a form of mechanistic explanations and proceed by proposing a general sketch of a functional architecture of a representational cognitive mechanism. According to the view on offer here, representational mechanisms are mechanisms that meet four conditions: the structural resemblance condition, the action-guidance condition, the decouplability condition, and the error-detection condition.

References Powered by Scopus

Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science

3417Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation

2370Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Thinking about mechanisms

2108Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Wilding the predictive brain

43Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Situated Neural Representations: Solving the Problems of Content

35Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Predictive processing and the representation wars: a victory for the eliminativist (via fictionalism)

34Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gładziejewski, P. (2015). Explaining cognitive phenomena with internal representations: A mechanistic perspective. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 40(53), 63–90. https://doi.org/10.1515/slgr-2015-0004

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

67%

Researcher 4

27%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Philosophy 10

63%

Psychology 3

19%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

13%

Materials Science 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0