International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound

2.2kCitations
Citations of this article
1.9kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study is to provide evidence-based and expert consensus recommendations for lung ultrasound with focus on emergency and critical care settings. Methods: A multidisciplinary panel of 28 experts from eight countries was involved. Literature was reviewed from January 1966 to June 2011. Consensus members searched multiple databases including Pubmed, Medline, OVID, Embase, and others. The process used to develop these evidence-based recommendations involved two phases: determining the level of quality of evidence and developing the recommendation. The quality of evidence is assessed by the grading of recommendation, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) method. However, the GRADE system does not enforce a specific method on how the panel should reach decisions during the consensus process. Our methodology committee decided to utilize the RAND appropriateness method for panel judgment and decisions/ consensus. Results: Seventythree proposed statements were examined and discussed in three conferences held in Bologna, Pisa, and Rome. Each conference included two rounds of face-to-face modified Delphi technique. Anonymous panel voting followed each round. The panel did not reach an agreement and therefore did not adopt any recommendations for six statements. Weak/ conditional recommendations were made for 2 statements, and strong recommendations were made for the remaining 65 statements. The statements were then recategorized and grouped to their current format. Internal and external peer-review processes took place before submission of the recommendations. Updates will occur at least every 4 years or whenever significant major changes in evidence appear. Conclusions: This document reflects the overall results of the first consensus conference on point-of-care lung ultrasound. Statements were discussed and elaborated by experts who published the vast majority of papers on clinical use of lung ultrasound in the last 20 years. Recommendations were produced to guide implementation, development, and standardization of lung ultrasound in all relevant settings. © Copyright jointly held by Springer and ESICM 2012.

References Powered by Scopus

GRADE guidelines: A new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

2252Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Relevance of lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute respiratory failure the BLUE protocol

1442Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Management of spontaneous pneumothorax: An American College of Chest Physicians Delphi Consensus Statement

1006Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure

10893Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC

5575Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Acute respiratory distress syndrome

677Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Volpicelli, G., Elbarbary, M., Blaivas, M., Lichtenstein, D. A., Mathis, G., Kirkpatrick, A. W., … Petrovic, T. (2012). International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound. In Intensive Care Medicine (Vol. 38, pp. 577–591). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-012-2513-4

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 539

57%

Researcher 207

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 135

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 64

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 1041

92%

Engineering 35

3%

Nursing and Health Professions 32

3%

Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medic... 25

2%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 2
News Mentions: 14
References: 5
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 31

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free