Does a Cross-Correlation of Economic Policy Uncertainty with China’s Carbon Market Really Exist? A Perspective on Fractal Market Hypothesis

3Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Under the efficient market hypothesis (EMH), part of the literature ignores the characteristics of carbon markets. Based on the fractal market hypothesis (FMH), using the MF-DCCA method, this empirical study complements related research. We studied the non-linear multifractal correlation between carbon price fluctuations and China’s economic policy uncertainty (CNEPU) in Shenzhen, Beijing, Tianjin, and the national carbon market. The results show the following: (1) There is no linear correlation between price volatility and CNEPU in all carbon markets. (2) In the national carbon market, the correlation linkage between price fluctuation and CNEPU has not yet formed. (3) In the three regional carbon markets of Shenzhen, Beijing, and Tianjin, the long-range correlations exist with anti-persistence multifractal characteristics, which means that an increase in CNEPU will reduce price fluctuations. (4) After dividing the time scale into long-term and short-term, we found that it does not change the multifractal characteristics but it does change the fractal intensity. Finally, some suggestions are given to policymakers and carbon finance investors.

References Powered by Scopus

6203Citations
3272Readers
Get full text

Multifractal detrended cross-correlation analysis for two nonstationary signals

681Citations
159Readers
Get full text
424Citations
319Readers

Your institution provides access to this article.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

An, Y., Jiang, K., & Song, J. (2023). Does a Cross-Correlation of Economic Policy Uncertainty with China’s Carbon Market Really Exist? A Perspective on Fractal Market Hypothesis. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151410818

Readers over time

‘23‘24‘2500.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 1

50%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

50%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 2

100%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0