Intra-Abdominal Fat Depots Represent Distinct Immunomodulatory Microenvironments: A Murine Model

43Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

White adipose tissue (WAT) is a multi-faceted endocrine organ involved in energy storage, metabolism, immune function and disease pathogenesis. In contrast to subcutaneous fat, visceral fat (V-WAT) has been associated with numerous diseases and metabolic disorders, indicating specific functions related to anatomical location. Although visceral depots are often used interchangeably in V-WAT-associated disease studies, there has been a recent subdivision of V-WAT into "true visceral" and non-visceral intra-abdominal compartments. These were associated with distinct physiological roles, illustrating a need for depot-specific information. Here, we use FACS analysis to comparatively characterize the leukocyte and progenitor populations in the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) of peritoneal serous fluid (PSF), parametrial (pmWAT), retroperitoneal (rpWAT), and omental (omWAT) adipose tissue from seven-month old C57BL/6 female mice. We found significant differences in SVF composition between all four microenvironments. PSF SVF was comprised almost entirely of CD45+ leukocytes (>99%), while omWAT contained less, but still almost two-fold more leukocytes than pmWAT and rpWAT (75%, 38% and 38% respectively; p<0.01). PmWAT was composed primarily of macrophages, whereas rpWAT more closely resembled omWAT, denoted by high levels of B1 B-cell and monocyte populations. Further, omWAT harbored significantly higher proportions of T-cells than the other tissues, consistent with its role as a secondary lymphoid organ. These SVF changes were also reflected in the gene expression profiles of the respective tissues. Thus, intra-abdominal fat pads represent independent immunomodulatory microenvironments and should be evaluated as distinct entities with unique contributions to physiological and pathological processes. © 2013 Cohen et al.

Figures

  • Figure 1. Adipose tissue depot weight and SVF cell counts. (A) Whole tissue weight. (B) Total number of SVF cells isolated from the digestion of each tissue. (C) Number of SVF cells isolated from the digestion of each milligram (mg) of adipose tissue. pmWAT; parametrial WAT, rpWAT; retroperitoneal WAT, omWAT; omental WAT. a,b,c Unlike letters indicate significance, p,0.05. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066477.g001
  • Figure 2. Flow cytometric analysis gating strategy. (A) Digested tissue samples were subjected to PI live/dead cell exclusion and CD45+ leukocytes were divided into R1 (lymphocytes) and R2 (mono-, granulocytes) gates based on forward/side scatter followed by doublet exclusion. (B) CD3+ T cells from R1 were further subclassified either as CD4+ TH, CD8 + TC or DN (double negative). (C) CD19 + B cells from R1 and R2 were further subclassified into CD11b+ B1 or CD11b2 B2. (D) Monocytic populations from R2 were classified based on CD11b, F4/80 and CD11c (not shown) staining, and further subdivided based on activation markers. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066477.g002
  • Table 1. Leukocyte Characterization of Immune Microenvironments.
  • Figure 3. Flow cytometric analysis of leukocyte populations in the SVF of (A) pmWAT, (B) rpWAT, (C) omWAT and (D) PSF. Natural killer (NK) cells include mNKs and preNKs, dendritic cells (DC) include DC (I) from R1 and DC (II) from R2, macrophages include large (LPMs) and small (SPM) peritoneal macrophages, monocytes include monocytes (I) (CD11b+F4/802) and monocytes (II) (CD11bloF4/802) populations, and ‘‘other’’ includes regulatory T cells (Treg), CD3 +CD42CD82NK1.12 subset, and myeloid precursors from R1, as well as neutrophils (PMNs), and pre-B or – macrophage cells (PreBoMs) from R2. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066477.g003
  • Figure 4. Myeloid populations found in pmWAT, rpWAT, omWAT and PSF. (A) Resident myeloid populations differ in a microenvironmentspecific manner. (B) Differential CD11b and F4/80 expression displayed as a percentage of total R2 gate. (C) Activation status of respective myeloid populations differ in a microenvironment-specific manner. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066477.g004
  • Figure 5. Identification of a unique CD45+ population in the PSF. Pre-B or –macrophage cells (PreBoMs) found within the R2 gate express CD19+CD11bhiF480+CD93+CD69+CD1d+CD5+ phenotype. This subset was not found in WAT. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066477.g005
  • Figure 6. Flow cytometric analysis of stem and progenitor cell markers. (A) Percentage of CD452 cells that are positive for indicated markers. (B) Total number of SVF cells positive for selected markers in pmWAT and omWAT. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066477.g006
  • Table 2. Gene Expression Profiles of Immune Microenvironments.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cohen, C. A., Shea, A. A., Heffron, C. L., Schmelz, E. M., & Roberts, P. C. (2013). Intra-Abdominal Fat Depots Represent Distinct Immunomodulatory Microenvironments: A Murine Model. PLoS ONE, 8(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066477

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 21

57%

Researcher 13

35%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

5%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11

38%

Immunology and Microbiology 8

28%

Medicine and Dentistry 5

17%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 5

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0