National study of non-urgent emergency department visits and associated resource utilization

58Citations
Citations of this article
95Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: Reducing non-urgent emergency department (ED) visits has been targeted as a method to produce cost savings. To better describe these visits, we sought to compare resource utilization of ED visits characterized as non-urgent at triage to immediate, emergent, or urgent (IEU) visits. Methods: We performed a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of the 2006-2009 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Urgency of visits was categorized using the assigned 5-level triage acuity score. We analyzed resource utilization, including diagnostic testing, treatment, and hospitalization within each acuity categorization. Results : From 2006-2009, 10.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.2-11.2) of United States ED visits were categorized as non-urgent. Most (87.8% [95% CI, 86.3-89.2]) non-urgent visits had some diagnostic testing or treatment in the ED. Imaging was common in non-urgent visits (29.8% [95% CI, 27.8-31.8]), although not as frequent as for IEU visits (52.9% [95% CI, 51.6-54.2]). Similarly, procedures were performed less frequently for non-urgent (34.1% [95% CI, 31.8-36.4]) compared to IEU visits (56.3% [95% CI, 53.5-59.0]). Medication administration was similar between the 2 groups (80.6% [95% CI, 79.5-81.7] vs. 76.3% [95% CI, 74.7-77.8], respectively). The rate of hospital admission was 4.0% (95% CI, 3.3-4.8) vs. 19.8% (95% CI, 18.4-21.3) for IEU visits, with admission to a critical care setting for 0.5% of non-urgent visits (95% CI, 0.3-0.6) vs. 3.4% (95% CI, 3.1-3.8) of IEU visits. Conclusions: For most non-urgent ED visits, some diagnostic or therapeutic intervention was performed. Relatively low, but notable proportions of non-urgent ED visits were admitted to the hospital, sometimes to a critical care setting. These data call into question non-urgent ED visits being categorized as "unnecessary," particularly in the setting of limited access to timely primary care for acute illness or injury.

References Powered by Scopus

Reliability and validity of a new five-level triage instrument

428Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The costs of visits to emergency departments

284Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Reliability and Validity of Scores on the Emergency Severity Index Version 3

276Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Emergency department and hospital crowding: Causes, consequences, and cures

128Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Avoidable emergency department visits: A starting point

57Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Factors Affecting Visits to the Emergency Department for Urgent and Nonurgent Ocular Conditions

48Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Honigman, L. S., Wiler, J. L., Rooks, S., & Ginde, A. A. (2013). National study of non-urgent emergency department visits and associated resource utilization. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 14(6), 609–616. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2013.5.16112

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 38

66%

Researcher 13

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

12%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 34

63%

Nursing and Health Professions 13

24%

Social Sciences 4

7%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3

6%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
News Mentions: 5

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0