Depth separation and the Ponzo illusion

10Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The Ponzo illusion refers to an apparent change in length of objectively equal parallel lines induced by enclosure within an acute angle. The present study investigated this illusory change in stimulus extent as a function of the relative depth positions of the parallel lines and the inducing angle. To permit facile and unconfounded manipulation of apparent depth, the stimuli comprising the Ponzo configuration were stereoscopic contours formed from dynamic random-element stereograms. The main results were: (1) apparent depth separation exerted a strong influence on illusion magnitude; (2) this influence was asymmetrical in that illusion magnitude decreased when the inducing angle appeared in depth behind the parallel lines and increased when the inducing angle appeared in depth in front of the lines. These data are consistent with a general theory of space perception that assumes that information about depth position is processed prior to information about stimulus characteristics. © 1983 Psychonomic Society, Inc.

References Powered by Scopus

Effect of depth separation on metacontrast masking

50Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

System for generating dynamic random-element stereograms

41Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Depth separation and lateral interference

38Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Seeing in Depth

122Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Perceiving in Depth

47Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A two-process theory of the response to size and distance

43Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Patterson, R., & Fox, R. (1983). Depth separation and the Ponzo illusion. Perception & Psychophysics, 34(1), 25–28. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205892

Readers over time

‘09‘11‘14‘18‘19‘20‘22‘2300.511.52

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 2

50%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

25%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Neuroscience 2

33%

Psychology 2

33%

Social Sciences 1

17%

Engineering 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0