Weighted network modules

204Citations
Citations of this article
234Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The inclusion of link weights into the analysis of network properties allows a deeper insight into the (often overlapping) modular structure of real-world webs. We introduce a clustering algorithm clique percolation method with weights (CPMw) for weighted networks based on the concept of percolating k-cliques with high enough intensity. The algorithm allows overlaps between the modules. First, we give detailed analytical and numerical results about the critical point of weighted k-clique percolation on (weighted) Erdos-Rényi graphs. Then, for a scientist collaboration web and a stock correlation graph we compute three-link weight correlations and with the CPMw the weighted modules. After reshuffling link weights in both networks and computing the same quantities for the randomized control graphs as well, we show that groups of three or more strong links prefer to cluster together in both original graphs. © IOP Publishing Ltd and Deutsche Physikalische Gesellschaft.

References Powered by Scopus

Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks

34516Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Emergence of scaling in random networks

29076Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Statistical mechanics of complex networks

16805Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Community detection in graphs

8567Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Detecting the overlapping and hierarchical community structure in complex networks

1645Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Overlapping community detection in networks: The state-of-the-art and comparative study

918Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Farkas, I. J., Ábel, D., Palla, G., & Vicsek, T. (2007). Weighted network modules. New Journal of Physics, 9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/9/6/180

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 105

58%

Researcher 45

25%

Professor / Associate Prof. 25

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 67

47%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33

23%

Physics and Astronomy 28

20%

Social Sciences 15

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free