A scoping review of implementation of health-focused interventions in vulnerable populations

8Citations
Citations of this article
60Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Vulnerable populations face significant challenges in getting the healthcare they need. A growing body of implementation science literature has examined factors, including facilitators and barriers, relevant to accessing healthcare in these populations. The purpose of this scoping review was to identify themes relevant for improving implementation of healthcare practices and programs for vulnerable populations. This scoping review relied on the methodological framework set forth by Arksey and O'Malley, and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to evaluate and structure our findings. A framework analytic approach was used to code studies. Of the five CFIR Domains, the Inner Setting and Outer Setting were the most frequently examined in the 81 studies included. Themes that were pertinent to each domain are as follows - Inner Setting: organizational culture, leadership engagement, and integration of the intervention; Outer Setting: networks, external policies, and patients' needs and resources; Characteristics of the Individual: knowledge and beliefs about the intervention, self-efficacy, as well as stigma (i.e., other attributes); Intervention Characteristics: complexities with staffing, cost, and adaptations; and Process: staff and patient engagement, planning, and ongoing reflection and evaluation. Key themes, including barriers and facilitators, are highlighted here as relevant to implementation of practices for vulnerable populations. These findings can inform tailoring of implementation strategies and health policies for vulnerable populations, thereby supporting more equitable healthcare.

References Powered by Scopus

Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework

20926Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation

19767Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science

8820Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Advancing healthcare equity through dissemination and implementation science

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Interventions to promote health equity: implications for implementation science in behavioral medicine

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Occupational Therapy in Psychiatric Short-Term Hospitalization Units: Scoping Review

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Daniels, S. I., Cheng, H., Gray, C., Kim, B., Stave, C. D., & Midboe, A. M. (2022, September 1). A scoping review of implementation of health-focused interventions in vulnerable populations. Translational Behavioral Medicine. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibac025

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘2509182736

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

41%

Researcher 8

36%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 6

33%

Medicine and Dentistry 5

28%

Social Sciences 4

22%

Psychology 3

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0