Constrained bundle methods with inexact minimization applied to the energy regulation provision problem

1Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

We consider a class of large scale robust optimization problems. While the robust optimization literature often relies on structural assumptions to reformulate the problem in a tractable form using duality, this method is not always applicable and can result in problems which are very large. We propose an alternative way of solving such problems by applying a constrained bundle method. The originality of the method lies in the fact that the minimization steps in the bundle method are solved approximately using the alternating direction method of multipliers. Numerical results from a power grid regulation problem are presented and support the relevance of the approach.

References Powered by Scopus

Distributed optimization and statistical learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers

16039Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Deriving robust counterparts of nonlinear uncertain inequalities

157Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cutting-set methods for robust convex optimization with pessimizing oracles

117Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Stochastic generation scheduling with variable renewable generation: Methods, applications, and future trends

18Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gorecki, T. T., & Jones, C. N. (2017). Constrained bundle methods with inexact minimization applied to the energy regulation provision problem (Vol. 50, pp. 12471–12476). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.1923

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

50%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

30%

Researcher 2

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 7

64%

Chemical Engineering 2

18%

Decision Sciences 1

9%

Computer Science 1

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free