Lower tidal volume strategy (≈3 ml/kg) combined with extracorporeal CO2 removal versus 'conventional' protective ventilation (6 ml/kg) in severe ARDS: The prospective randomized Xtravent-study

460Citations
Citations of this article
400Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Acute respiratory distress syndrome is characterized by damage to the lung caused by various insults, including ventilation itself, and tidal hyperinflation can lead to ventilator induced lung injury (VILI). We investigated the effects of a low tidal volume (V T) strategy (V T ≈ 3 ml/kg/predicted body weight [PBW]) using pumpless extracorporeal lung assist in established ARDS. Methods: Seventy-nine patients were enrolled after a 'stabilization period' (24 h with optimized therapy and high PEEP). They were randomly assigned to receive a low V T ventilation (≈3 ml/kg) combined with extracorporeal CO2 elimination, or to a ARDSNet strategy (≈6 ml/kg) without the extracorporeal device. The primary outcome was the 28-days and 60-days ventilator-free days (VFD). Secondary outcome parameters were respiratory mechanics, gas exchange, analgesic/sedation use, complications and hospital mortality. Results: Ventilation with very low V T's was easy to implement with extracorporeal CO2-removal. VFD's within 60 days were not different between the study group (33.2 ± 20) and the control group (29.2 ± 21, p = 0.469), but in more hypoxemic patients (PaO2/FIO2 ≤150) a post hoc analysis demonstrated significant improved VFD-60 in study patients (40.9 ± 12.8) compared to control (28.2 ± 16.4, p = 0.033). The mortality rate was low (16.5 %) and did not differ between groups. Conclusions: The use of very low V T combined with extracorporeal CO2 removal has the potential to further reduce VILI compared with a 'normal' lung protective management. Whether this strategy will improve survival in ARDS patients remains to be determined (Clinical trials NCT 00538928). © 2013 The Author(s).

References Powered by Scopus

Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome

11089Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The American-European Consensus Conference on ARDS: Definitions, mechanisms, relevant outcomes, and clinical trial coordination

5569Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The acute respiratory distress syndrome

4746Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Ventilator-induced lung injury

1545Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An official American Thoracic Society/European Society of intensive care medicine/society of critical care medicine clinical practice guideline: Mechanical ventilation in adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome

1130Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Acute respiratory distress syndrome advances in diagnosis and treatment

1105Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bein, T., Weber-Carstens, S., Goldmann, A., Müller, T., Staudinger, T., Brederlau, J., … Slutsky, A. S. (2013). Lower tidal volume strategy (≈3 ml/kg) combined with extracorporeal CO2 removal versus “conventional” protective ventilation (6 ml/kg) in severe ARDS: The prospective randomized Xtravent-study. Intensive Care Medicine, 39(5), 847–856. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-012-2787-6

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 138

55%

Researcher 65

26%

Professor / Associate Prof. 34

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 12

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 256

87%

Nursing and Health Professions 21

7%

Engineering 12

4%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6

2%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
News Mentions: 4
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 65

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free