The effects of sexual orientation on hirability ratings: An experimental study

43Citations
Citations of this article
61Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Despite its rising importance, empirical research about sexual orientation in the workplace is still scarce. This experimental study examined if gay candidates, with the same work-related qualities as heterosexual candidates, would be judged less favorably in a personnel selection context. Written candidate profiles were varied in a 3 × 3 between-subjects factorial design, with candidate quality and sexual orientation as experimental variables. Our results indicated that the hirability ratings of 135 selection professionals were based on candidate quality and that no discrimination on the basais of sexual orientation occurred. Implications of these findings and directions for future research are discussed.

References Powered by Scopus

Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups

2252Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Organizational Justice: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow

2123Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Pink triangles: Antecedents and consequences of perceived workplace discrimination against gay and lesbian employees

537Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The individual experience of unemployment

505Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Stock price reactions to GLBT nondiscrimination policies

75Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Anticipated Discrimination and a Career Choice in Nonprofit: A Study of Early Career Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgendered (LGBT) Job Seekers

73Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van Hoye, G., & Lievens, F. (2003). The effects of sexual orientation on hirability ratings: An experimental study. Journal of Business and Psychology, 18(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025078819951

Readers over time

‘10‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 32

71%

Researcher 6

13%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 21

46%

Business, Management and Accounting 12

26%

Social Sciences 9

20%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0