C-terminal Src Kinase Gates Homeostatic Synaptic Plasticity and Regulates Fasciclin II Expression at the Drosophila Neuromuscular Junction

17Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Forms of homeostatic plasticity stabilize neuronal outputs and promote physiologically favorable synapse function. A well-studied homeostatic system operates at the Drosophila melanogaster larval neuromuscular junction (NMJ). At the NMJ, impairment of postsynaptic glutamate receptor activity is offset by a compensatory increase in presynaptic neurotransmitter release. We aim to elucidate how this process operates on a molecular level and is preserved throughout development. In this study, we identified a tyrosine kinase-driven signaling system that sustains homeostatic control of NMJ function. We identified C-terminal Src Kinase (Csk) as a potential regulator of synaptic homeostasis through an RNAi- and electrophysiology-based genetic screen. We found that Csk loss-of-function mutations impaired the sustained expression of homeostatic plasticity at the NMJ, without drastically altering synapse growth or baseline neurotransmission. Muscle-specific overexpression of Src Family Kinase (SFK) substrates that are negatively regulated by Csk also impaired NMJ homeostasis. Surprisingly, we found that transgenic Csk-YFP can support homeostatic plasticity at the NMJ when expressed either in the muscle or in the nerve. However, only muscle-expressed Csk-YFP was able to localize to NMJ structures. By immunostaining, we found that Csk mutant NMJs had dysregulated expression of the Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule homolog Fasciclin II (FasII). By immunoblotting, we found that levels of a specific isoform of FasII were decreased in homeostatically challenged GluRIIA mutant animals–but markedly increased in Csk mutant animals. Additionally, we found that postsynaptic overexpression of FasII from its endogenous locus was sufficient to impair synaptic homeostasis, and genetically reducing FasII levels in Csk mutants fully restored synaptic homeostasis. Based on these data, we propose that Csk and its SFK substrates impinge upon homeostatic control of NMJ function by regulating downstream expression or localization of FasII.

Figures

  • Fig 1. Csk is required for long-term homeostatic plasticity at the NMJ. (A) RNAi-mediated Csk knock down blocks synaptic homeostasis. Miniature excitatory postsynaptic potential amplitudes (mEPSP; gray) and quantal content (QC; white) normalized to genetic controls (dashed line) lacking a homeostatic challenge (non-GluRIII knockdown control). For bothGluRIII andCsk, RNAi-mediated knock down is driven by the simultaneous presence of pre- and postsynaptic GAL4 drivers (see Methods and S1 Table for full genotypes). (B) Representative electrophysiological traces. Scale bar for EPSP (mEPSP): y = 5 mV (0.5 mV), x = 50 ms (1 s). (C) Normalized mEPSP and QC forGluRIIASP16 mutant, GluRIIASP16; Cskc04256 double mutant, and GluRIIASP16; Cskc04256/Cskj1D8 double mutant NMJs.GluRIIA; Csk NMJs did not execute homeostatic increases in QC compared to baseline controls. (D) Representative electrophysiological traces. Scale bars as in B. (E) Normalized mEPSP and QC forGluRIIASP16 mutant, cacS/+;GluRIIASP16mutant, GluRIIASP16; Cskj1D8/+ double mutant, and cacS/+; GluRIIASP16; Cskj1D8/+ triple mutant NMJs. (F) Normalized mEPSP and QC for Cskc02456mutants treated with philanthotoxin-433 (PhTox). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, ns—not significant (p > 0.1) by Student’s T-test comparing homeostatically challenged mutants to their unchallenged (non-GluRIII KD, non-GluRIIA, or non-PhTox) genetic controls.
  • Fig 2. Cskmutant NMJs display normal growth. Bouton staining of (A) wild-type and (B)GluRIIASP16;Cskc04256 NMJs. Boutons were stained presynaptically by anti-Synapsin (green) and postsynaptically by anti-Dlg (red). Scale bar = 10 μm. (C-D”) Active zone staining of (C-C”)GluRIIASP16 and (D-D”)GluRIIASP16;Cskc04256mutant NMJs. The neuron is marked by HRP (blue), presynaptic active zones are marked by Brp (C, D, and green), and glutamate receptors are marked by GluRIII (C’, D’, and red). Scale bar = 5 μm. (E)Quantification of the bouton staining shown in A and B, muscle 6/7 synapse, segments A2 or A3 as indicated. Values shown are number of boutons per muscle area. See S1 Fig for non-normalized bouton number and muscle area. (F)Quantification of the active zone staining shown in C and D. Active zones were counted using Imaris 3D rendering software. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, ns—not significant (p > 0.1) by Student’s T-test.
  • Fig 3. Cskmutant NMJs display normal baseline neurotransmission. (A) Values for mEPSP amplitude (black), EPSP amplitude (gray), and quantal content (QC; white) normalized to wild type (dashed line). No measures were significantly different from wild type. (B) Representative electrophysiological traces for the
  • Fig 4. Csk genetically opposes Src family kinases in the context of synaptic homeostasis. (A-D) Values for mEPSP amplitude (gray) and quantal content (QC; white) normalized to genetic controls that lack a homeostatic challenge (non-GluRIIAControl, dashed line). (A-B)Muscle-specific SFK overexpression (OE) impairs synaptic homeostasis, while neuron-specific OE does not. (C) Src64B/+mutation partially suppresses theGluRIIA; Csk block of synaptic homeostasis. (D) Src42A/+ and Src64B/+ genetic conditions do not confer homeostatic defects on their own. (E) Representative electrophysiological traces for data shown in C. Scale bar for EPSP (mEPSP) traces: y = 5 mV (0.5 mV), x = 50 ms (1 s). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 *** p < 0.001 ns—not significant (p > 0.1) by Student’s T-test of homeostatically challenged mutants directly to their unchallenged (non-GluRIIA) controls or by ANOVA (Tukey’s post-hoc) when comparing across multiple homeostatically-challenged genotypes in a dataset.
  • Fig 5. Transgenic Csk is sufficient for homeostatic compensation either presynaptically or postsynaptically. Average values for (A)mEPSP amplitude, (B) EPSP amplitude, and (C) quantal content (QC) for GAL4 driver control (concurrent elaV(C155)-Gal4, Sca-Gal4, BG57-Gal4) NMJs and those
  • Fig 6. Glial Csk regulates Fasciclin II localization at the NMJ. (A-E) Immunostaining of anti-FasII (green), anti-Dlg (red), and anti-HRP (blue) at NMJs with the following genotypes: (A-A”) wild type, (B-B”) Cskc04256, (C-C”) Cskc04256/Cskj1D8, (D-D”) Csk-RNAi expressed in the whole animal (Tubulin-Gal4), and (E-E”) CskRNAi expressed only in glia (Nrv2-Gal4). Extra-synaptic FasII was defined as FasII signal found outside the Dlg-stained region. Areas with high levels of extra-synaptic FasII are indicated with white arrows. Scale bar = 10 μm for A and 5 μm for A”. (F) Relative levels of extra-synaptic FasII debris (extra-synaptic FasII
  • Fig 7. Expression of a Fasciclin II isoform is lowered during synaptic homeostasis and regulated byCsk. (A-E) Representative images of FasII immunostaining at NMJs that are (A) wild type, (B) Cskc04256/Cskj1D8, (C) expressingCsk-RNAi in muscle and neurons, (D) expressingCsk-RNAi in only muscle, and (E) expressingCsk-RNAi in only neurons. (F) Average values for synaptic FasII fluorescence intensity normalized to synapse area and
  • Fig 8. Excess FasII impairs synaptic homeostasis. (A-E) Values for mEPSP amplitude (gray) and quantal content (QC; white) normalized to genetic controls (dashed line) that lack a homeostatic challenge (non-GluRIII KD or non-GluRIIA controls). (A) Trans-synaptic FasII overexpression (O/E) from the FasII endogenous locus (FasIIEP1462) shows partial impairment of synaptic homeostasis, as does (B)muscle-specific overexpression with FasIIEP1462. (C) Overexpressing specific isoforms of FasII does not impair homeostatic compensation. (D)Overexpressing Csk-YFP in addition to FasIIEP1462 fails to suppress the homeostatic defects of FasII O/E seen in B. (E) Neither FasII loss-of-function mutations nor FasII knockdown (KD) impairs synaptic homeostasis. (F) Average values for synaptic FasII and Dlg fluorescence intensity normalized to synapse area. (G-H) Representative images of FasII immunostaining for trans-synaptic FasII overexpression. Scale bar = 10 μm. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, ns—not significant (p > 0.08) by Student’s T-test comparing homeostatically challenged mutants to their unchallenged (non-GluRIIA) controls.

References Powered by Scopus

Quantal components of the end‐plate potential

1469Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mitogen-activated protein kinases in apoptosis regulation

1313Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The developmental transcriptome of Drosophila melanogaster

1161Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Neural Cell Adhesion Molecules of the Immunoglobulin Superfamily Regulate Synapse Formation, Maintenance, and Function

188Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Homeostatic control of Drosophila neuromuscular junction function

46Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Disparate Postsynaptic Induction Mechanisms Ultimately Converge to Drive the Retrograde Enhancement of Presynaptic Efficacy

40Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Spring, A. M., Brusich, D. J., & Frank, C. A. (2016). C-terminal Src Kinase Gates Homeostatic Synaptic Plasticity and Regulates Fasciclin II Expression at the Drosophila Neuromuscular Junction. PLoS Genetics, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005886

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 23

74%

Researcher 7

23%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Neuroscience 14

41%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11

32%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 7

21%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

6%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 187

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0