Components of the full blood count as risk factors for colorectal cancer detection: A systematic review protocol

3Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction Colorectal cancer is the fourth most common type of cancer and the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths in the UK. The full blood count (FBC) is a blood test that may play a role in early detection of the disease. Previous studies have aimed to identify how levels of individual components, such as haemoglobin, can be used to assist the diagnosis. We aim to systematically review studies to identify whether components of the FBC are risk factors for diagnosis of colorectal cancer, critically appraise the methods used to assess the association and assess performance of the components. Methods and analysis The MEDLINE (via OVID), EMBASE (via OVID), CINAHL (via EBSCOhost) and Web of Science databases will be searched to identify studies reporting the association between the levels of at least one FBC component and the risk of a future diagnosis of colorectal cancer in undiagnosed individuals. Clincialtrials.gov and the WHO registry will be searched to identify relevant ongoing research. Search terms will include relevant Medical Subject Headings and Emtree headings, and free-Text terms relating to FBC, colorectal cancer and diagnosis. No date or language restrictions will be applied. Two reviewers will independently identify the studies for inclusion and perform data extraction. Time intervals between the blood tests and diagnosis will form the subgroups for analysis. Ethics and dissemination There is no direct patient involvement and only published articles will be reviewed; no ethical approval is required. Results from this review will set a foundation for intended future work on developing a new risk score for early detection of colorectal cancer, derived using FBC data. This systematic review will also provide guidance on the analysis of time to diagnosis. The model will be freely available to UK primary care practices. PROSPERO registration number CRD42019134400.

References Powered by Scopus

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

53167Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support

35388Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement

17508Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The full blood count blood test for colorectal cancer detection: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and critical appraisal

27Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Marginalized Frailty-Based Illness-Death Model: Application to the UK-Biobank Survival Data

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Trends in the full blood count blood test and colorectal cancer detection: a longitudinal, case-control study of UK primary care patient data

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Virdee, P. S., Kirtley, S., Elhussein, L., Watkinson, P. J., Holt, T. A., & Birks, J. (2019, December 16). Components of the full blood count as risk factors for colorectal cancer detection: A systematic review protocol. BMJ Open. BMJ Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032759

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

38%

Researcher 5

38%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 8

67%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

17%

Engineering 1

8%

Environmental Science 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free